Why the central idea in the Big Bang theory is the biggest stupidity in the history of sciences ?  

1) They accepted an absurdity, which it has been observed and analyzed from the known philosophers, a lot of centuries before and with impressive logic from the ancient Greek philosophers.

2) They left the question in the dark, provocatively and with disregard, what can exist before the creation of the Universe and how much different can be a previous reality. Almost, they prohibited us to we wonder about this question, with the ridiculous argument, that the time did not exist before the creation - the time, a word so much abstracted.

3) They infringed their own axiom about the " conservation of energy " systematically and they opened the gates in the absurdity, implying that exists an other reality where does not have nothing relation with our reality, such us we have been taught in the physics.

4) Scorn in the philosophy and in the creative thought for thousands thinkers also philosophers. From the older years, many philosophers formulated all the occasions and the opinions that they prove, how all the things are conditioned by common laws or [they obey] in the same beginning or they are always connected with something the common, or they are constituted by the same substance.

5) They insisted and appeared provocatively and they maintained longly-lasting an antiscientific idea, an absurdity, without respect in the intelligence of unskilled, after with a minimal respect, it would be an enough warning about likely inversion of this idea, in each interview, in their speech, at the briefing or with a simple statement.

6) They accepted this absurdity a very big number of scientists from the world community, in between them the most famous scientists and those, that they were suitable and charged in order to does not become a such error.

7) They have allocated the better tools, the most evolved technological means and abundant time, those which were also professionals, in certain cases with the financing of enormous pecuniary sums, while the ancient philosophers had only one millionth of their knowledge.

8) They had all advantages in order to they do not make such childish errors and to do not fall in such fallacy, as  the education, fame, ambition, briefing, collaboration and serious clues of fault, which they downgraded.

9) In the usual books of physics, were written the observations and information that reveals the correct direction of researches, so that are avoided their theoretical impasses and in order to found the solutions that they sought. However, they did not have the education and the mentality that is needed in order to they can think more logically. For umpteenth time, was absent the candour, shone the arrogance and was lost precious time.  I ask you : Was it more logical, more reliable and intelligent for an astrophysicist,  to reverses the highest frequency fmax in the Universe (the end of electromagnetic spectrum), he make a minimal time 1/fmax = Tmin  and then he searches what existed in the first seconds? This immature thought they made without have conscience ! 

Almost entire the scientific community has accepted as fact the creation of Universe in the most distant past. All the writers and the journalists repeats as parrots for a lot of decades one from the bigger stupidities in the science, with the "insurance cover" from the leading physicists and astronomers. See now, how they will downgrade and justify this historical absurdity ! The stupidity becomes furthermore incredible, because the correction and revelation of the error, did not become from the professionals of scientific community and from a researcher astronomer. The completed (without impasses) answer in the modern astrophysical questions and the correction in the Big Bang theory, it will hear for always in the title " Theory about the Completed Time and Relativity of Energy" or in the alternative title " Theory about the Completed and Simultaneous Universe".

CERN : European Organism of Nuclear Researches. The bigger inquiring centre in the world, for research of Big Objectives (Big Science), that needs the contribution of many countries. Effort and research of all humanity. Attendance from 26 and more countries. More from 6500 scientists, 500 universities and thousands workers. There, we find the bigger -this moment- accelerator of elementary particles (LHC) in an undergrounds circular tunnel of 27 km length. The cost of its manufacture more than 6 billions Euros. Some of the experiments that are prepare or execute there, they are to be completed after a lot of years.

CERN and NASA, two names that cause awe, that assembles all know-how of planet, up to the last scientific discovery and in that, they contribute many top-flight scientists and researchers of all specialities. We leave outside… the inquiring centers and the Universities of all developed countries of earth.

 AS MUCH AS IT WAS POSSIBLE AND LOGICAL, THE UNIVERSE WAS CREATED (BOTH THE SPACE AND TIME) BY AN INITIAL ABNORMALITY, SO MUCH INTELLIGENT AND CAPABLE THEY WERE THE DIRECTORS IN THE INQUIRING CENTERS FOR THE INVESTIGATION ABOUT THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE.

Theory about the Completed Time and Relativity of Energy or Theory about the Completed also Common Time Universe: Each educated person, from his school years still, if he was studious pupil, has read that the observation and the research of exclusively individual things leaves in the dark, the role of entirety and the total for the existence, connection and the regulation between its parts and their relations. Each educated person has read and understood, that from the analysis of a dynamic total in its components or in simpler parts, they are lost certain relations, that needs and exists only when the parts constitute a total (for example, a human body). He has understood, that the total and the form are not always a sum of parts, but something more, particularly when the connection between parts becomes dynamically and no statically.

Also, each educated person has heard and each scientist knows, that in a lot of separate observations about the individual things and in a crowd of phenomena, we find what they have common or what is repeated in per time with the same conditions (as a law). From the enormous volume of data in our observation, from the crowd of experiments and from the long-lasting verification, we reach in to a short opinion-assessment, that is reported in a crowd of cases. In the school, such concise and fundamental opinions in order to is in effect a crowd of particular cases, they are marked as SOS. When somebody reaches from straight line in the central idea - that the observations of separate phenomena leads, when these is generalized-, this theorist researcher is found in an advantageous place. This theorist researcher be able to interpret the impasses and the errors of the other researchers and to goes a step more beyond, until to they awaken those that be at a dead end. If we lead in to such abridgements and general ascertainments, if a big number of pages with a lot of analyses can be summarizen and said with a minimal number of words and formulations, if they exist particular phenomena and things that need the fundamental laws (that they regulate all the total of things), then WHAT DID LEAD THE SCIENTISTS TO BELIEVE, THAT THE THEORETICAL INVESTIGATION IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN THE EXPERIMENTS IN CERN? WHAT DID LEAD THE SCIENTISTS TO BELIEVE THAT WE COULD NOT FIND THE GENERAL THOUGHTS FROM THE THEORETICAL RESEARCH (IN STRAIGHT WAY) NEVER AND WE COULD NOT APPROACH IN THE CONCRETE AND PARTICULAR DISCOVERIES, WHICH THE GENERAL IDEAS DO SUMMARIZE THEM? WHAT DID LEAD THE SCIENTISTS TO BELIEVE SO MUCH DISCOURAGINGLY, HOW THROUGH THE SIMPLE GENERAL THOUGHTS (EMPTY THOUGHTS LIKE THE FREE SPACE), IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE  WE CAN FIND THE IMPORTANT CONCLUSIONS AND DISCOVER RELATIONS, WHICH WE OBSERVE THEM WITH MORE DIFFICULTY OR ACCIDENTALLY AT THE RESEARCH OF INDIVIDUAL THINGS? WHAT DID LEAD THE SCIENTISTS TO DOWNGRADE AND BE INDIFFERENT TO THE POSSIBILITY OF THE HUMAN TO DO PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHTS? THEY BELIEVED SO FROM A KNOWLEDGE AND WITH LOGIC OR FROM THE EXPECTATIONS, THAT THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, THE EXPERIMENTS AND THE PROFESSIONAL RE-ESTABLISHMENT THEY DID GIVE IN THEM?

The achievement of theory about the Completed Time, will cause a lot of question marks about the human intelligence and about the role of knowledge in the faculties of the human. It doesn't only give the solutions in many important philosophical and scientific questions, moreover it gives the answers with the simpler thoughts and with the best-aimed observations, in which are reduced many peculiar terms of the sciences. The arrest, the analysis of initial ideas and a crowd of consequences in the science they could become more soon from one only person, without costly experiments. They could be avoided big fooleries, such as the central idea of Big Bang theory and decreased the excessive expectations from the study of minimal particles. If the theoretical thought in the cosmological questions could it thus advances fast and it meets a crowd of scientific observations, then each one of us can perceive a dangerous enormous void, in where is found each scientific research, when it comes with delay, with a lot of expenses and with feeling of satisfaction of announcing to say, something where a mad or intruder had observed. As it happens in the personal life - when are reversed our opinions with that regulated our life- it is not become easily acceptable and comprehensible to spoil the fable of scientific impartiality, are ridiculed the models and the symbols of reliability, an accidental intruder bring at a disadvantage the professionals and more seldom, this accidental constitute threat of certain big interests. This film from the reactions, the indifference and the closeness in thought of scientific world toward certain pioneer… it has been appeared again and needs a scientific investigation. Not simply, they are not capable to discover, to correct an error and to supplement the void of their knowledge, not simply their thought freezes when they do not have all information of recipe with which they learned to resolve the scientific problems, but neither they can recognize the approaching in the solution that gives a nonentity pioneer. Unfortunately, in order to eradicate the biases of scientific community it needs to pass many years.

* The effort for an unified and a total answer in the questions that concern the creation and destination of world and the unified answer in a crowd of other scientific questions has begun from the philosophers a lot of centuries ago and with powerful arguments. The possibility of an unified answer on these questions and the opinion about the existence of a common substance behind the crowd of different things and forces are not an original inspiration from modern physicists, neither it require more reliable scientific observations.