*

THE COMPLETE COSMOS, THE MATTER & THE WAVE PHENOMENA

*

 

 

 

 

starINTRO PAGE

 

 

For creatively thinking!

"If I could know in the beginning that I learn now !" popular Greek saying

 


Gr language  Eng lang

 

 

 

THE RELATIVITY OF TIME AND ENERGY  ---  THE MICROSCOPIC EXPLOSIONS OF "EMPTY" SPACE

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

 

 ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

???

spacer

 

c =2,997924 x108 m/s

 

 

h = 6,62606 x 10-34 kg m2 / sec

 

 

π = 3,141592...

 

 

2π = 6,283185

 

 

c2 =8,98755 x1016

 

 

μο = 4π x 10-7 H/m

 

 

εο=1/36π 109 F/m

 

 

μο/εο =zo =μο c

 

 

c = 1 / √ μο εο

 

 

c2 = 1 / μο εο

 

 

Ε = h f = hc / λ

 

 

Εo = m c2 = F λ

 

 

Fη = k q1 q2 / r2  

 

 

c=120π /4π x10-7  

 

 

zo=120π   

 

 

c / h =fmax  

 

 

 c = fmax λmin

 

 

 c = amax tmin

 

 

c = zo / μ

 

 

 fmax=Vmax /λmin

 

 

Fmax=Emax /λmin

 

 

  λmin = c2 /amax

 

 

  amax = c2 / λmin

 

 

amax=λmin fmax2

 

 

Emax=Fmax λmin

 

 

 Emax = fmax h

 

 

Henry Farad =sec2

 

 

e=1,602176 x10-19

 

 

√2 = 1,4142135

 

 

0,452444 x1042

 

 

1,35639 x1050 

 

 

1,23559 x1020

 

 

 

2,26873 x1023

 

 

 

h / c λmin = Mmax

 

 

 

Vmax = Mmax V / M

 

 

 

h c  / λ = Mpl G / λ

 

 

 

 

λe / re 2π = c / Vκ

 

 

 

 

1rad / s ~ 0,1591 Hz

 

 

 

 

.

 

Relativity of time or energy? - The big traps of experience - the small explosions of indivisible space…

 

 

THE BIG EXPLOSION IN THE FIELD OF SCIENCE

 

bang! The natural laws, which regulate the existence and the structure of material elements are not messages that come from their outside, from far and insubstantial way. These laws begin from the common " contact " that the all structural elements have with one and the same " empty " space, with one and common completed reality, with the same " communal " quantity of energy, finally from the common (invisible) their substance. The total quantity of energy is the same for the all things and the all structural elements takes shape with the same fluctuations of energy in one and same dynamic space.

 

planet Earth

bang! The first publication in the world

 

 

bang!

 

BIG QUESTIONS - SHORT ANSWERS !

THE MATHEMATIC MEETING OF PHILOSOPHY WITH THE PHYSICS AND THE SCIENCE FOREVER 

 

 

 

            

The first official publication in 2000 year

~ Many years ago: It is incredible, how through thoughts, with the daily vocabulary and with the observation only in the thought, without calculations and experiments, came out in succession a lot of reasonable thoughts, that they give the answers in there that a scientific community fails! They are reasonable answers that the science still seeks and an unaware human will characterize them mad opinions. The extracts that follow are the bigger challenge of Philosophy in the specialization.

 

 

The question about the limits and unity of world, in brevity.

 

Do you said that don't exist eternal truths for the nature? The first universal relations constitute world axioms, certain clauses with mathematic consequence, that predetermine the undeniably foundations of cosmology* and disappear certain foolish queries, even theories that bet in the precision of certain mathematic calculations. Certain of these relations are extracted and enumerated with a priority afterwards (without care in order to they are corrected or supplemented here).

 

EXTRACTS FROM THE PHILOSOPHICAL BOOK " THE THEOLOGY OF THE SCIENCE" ISBN 960-385-019-5 © 2000   (in GR publication)

 

Attention! They exist translational errors.

• " Each part of the Universe isn't the total from the all moments and from definition it exists always in a partial moment and not in other partial moment " .1

• " The things are direct parts of the same reality and constitute a common total " .2

• " The things have relations the one with the other, that is to say they interact and are influenced between them " .3

• " The things interact immediately and indirectly, in different and in the same moments, with a lot of different ways " .4

• " The causes and results are the things themself and their behavior. (...) 5 Each part of reality is a cause not common for all results and simultaneously a result not common for the all causes and interact with residual things " .6

• " The relation or connection of the part with the total reality is not only indirect and external " .7

• " Each part of reality always differ immediately from its totality… " .8

• " Two things without something common immediately in their quality or in their relations with the other things, would be utterly extraneous, utterly irrelevant and without some possibility for direct or indirect influence " .9

• " When we say that the things are dependent between them we mean, that they are influenced permanently what and how are, from what and ways are the remainder (residual;) things or some other " .10

• " There that exists an interaction, they exist always the common traits of the cause and result " .11

• " The results of a cause are not those of an other cause and we find some causes, that are irrelevant from certain results or have an enough indirect relation, which they could not have. So as we say, they exist combined a lot of causality chains " .12

• " The same cause on different things cannot has precisely or the all same consequences, while in direct or indirect relation with certain other causes is probable to determine differently or opposite results. The same cause can determines a different result and the same result is determined by a different cause… " .13

• " In reality, each part influences and modifies the rests, however not all the things in the same moment " .14

• " The influences are continued with some ways not regularly determined, with changes in the quality, activity and interaction of the intermediate things and thus they exist results, which are not determined regularly by one and the same cause. In other words, they are materialized or exist results, for which certain of the causes have ceased exist or determine them and reversely: They exist causes that don't constitute the alone or first beginning for the existence of certain results and however, these contribute or are useful for the existence of those, even when these causes are not exist" .15

• " The indeterminable or said accidental, in reality is the unstable determination, which is explained from indirect (and relative) contribution between from dependent each other parts " .16

• " No one thing, which isn't the sufficient cause of itself, can not be the alone cause for the existence or quality of other things (...) However, it can't to be not a cause or produces nothing result… " .17

• " The alone (or sufficient) cause (...) which does not have an other cause except itself, contrary to the partly causes, it is the perfect total (consequently and those segmental things together) ".18

• " The same things are certain causes for themself, because their existence is a part of one and same selfed-determine quality and not only an exterior part and for this reason, they are determined not only indirectly - externally. Their sufficient cause is not an exterior fundamental nor exterior final cause, it is their direct total, parts of which are straightway " .19

• " In order to exists interaction (or difference in the time), it should exist things, which aren't the sufficient cause for self " .20

• " Each thing, externally for other things and independently from the moment in which it exists, it can be considered as a partial result, in the realisation of which they have contributed indirectly (and always) all remainder things as certain causes " .21

• " Independently from the moment in which each thing begins to exists, it has been influenced more indirectly by each other thing and it has influence indirectly each other, too " .22

• " The all things constitute a constant total inside of the limits of a common time, they aren't numberless, they do not interact with unlimited ways and the most indirect way that each one influences the other isn't infinite " .23

• " The most indirect ways of interaction are those that have always become. (...) What are these more indirect results, which are always determined in the quality of each thing? As it will be proved, they are these common elements, the common ways of interaction, which are named matter " .24

• " The results from most indirect interaction of the things, they are the things with less interactions (...) 25 they constitute the stabilised ways of influence, that we name matter. (...) 26 The material elements are the stabilised ways, with which the Universe has always become in its minimal moment and in the abstract reality does constitute the simpler qualities of things " .27

• "The most indirect way, with which a thing influences each other after a time interval and through the all other parts, it should be common and regularly the same way, and does not exist always an other more indirect way" .28

• " The reality of in its entirety Time is finished (before the relative moment in which exist its parts as externally) and for this reason, they aren't only the things of previous moments, that influence those things of next moments, but also reversely… " .29

• " The substance is the constant and uncreated beginning for the relative things and this does not mean, that it is the rest from the abstraction of each change and action. From a such substance would be absent the quality and complexness. Not only without the substance they can't exist relations, changes, possibilities, but also without the last ones is not exists the substance as the first - common source " .30

• " The material elements are the ways, with which the Universal Quality begins relatively to become indirectly in its minimal moment " .31

• " The different complex qualities can not be explained only from certain common and exterior substances for the same reason, that could not be explained the existence of differences in initial common (and simple) entities/substances " .32

• " The part such as something abstracted is always the itself, is always a part, but its ceaseless change means that it is not precisely the same and without quality, nowise. The concept of change and time presuppose this part changes partly and isn't only one or simple/lonesome " .33

• " The things exist limited, they are in reference to other, and also indirection of their existence presupposes a lack of directness, time and substance. (...) The all things are direct the same common substance and they are connected together immediately, simultaneously (...) If the total of things weren't a direct cause for its self, if it weren't with a stabilised quality (like a total Time), then the said things would not constitute some ways of a common substance (...) and they couldn't be with a relatively constant and united quality, neither have some common traits between them " .34  ".

 

The Theology of the Science, ©2000, ISBN 960-385-019-5 

(1) page108, (2) page114, (3) page113, (4) page124, (5) page124, (6) page130, (7) page109, (8) page109, (9) page110, (10) page111, (11) page124, (12) page124, (13) page127, (14) page127, (15) page128, (16) page131, (17) page129, (18) page129-130, (19) page130, (20) page133, (21) page128, (22) page140, (23) page139, (24) page129, (25) page141, (26) page140, (27) page158, (28) page161, (29) page157, (30) page143, (31) page141, (32) page137, (33) page110, (34) page144-145

 

In the fundamental thoughts that are enumerated with a selected course (thread;), are expressed with some vagueness (no however ambiguously) the most abstract concepts (categories Aristotle's), such as particularly is the concept about the part, total and relation. The description for the world as a totality and as a part imposes the concept (significance) about the relation and quantity. The union in concept of a totality with the concept of the time imposes the concept about the change and dynamic relation between the parts. Then it is imposed are determined the relations of resemblance, identity and difference between the part and totality. These first relations worded are relations with mathematic prospect, such as is in the mathematics the relation of the unit with itself unit and such as the division or multiplication of the unit imposes the concept about the quantity and proportion. The vagueness is the returning for the generalisation.  However, it does not cancel the importance of the universal concepts, when undeniably they are addressed in an unspecified crowd of things and phenomena and not in our fantasies.

In order to I anticipate, the rejective logic of some dogmatic people, that with their sufficient and universal criteria they believe, that can beforehand decide, without need to hear or look at, it was written the following footnote with the first general thoughts: " The abstract concepts about thing and part are used with the unspecified broadness of an unknown x, which corresponds in a limit of possible solutions, by which a big part is considered known and real. Through the interconnection of their concepts in the development of reasoning their limits and importance will be clarified ".

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

• If we meet so much thoughtlessness, lack of ideas and initiative, unconcern for the clues, long-lasting tolerance in the biases, cowardice for the expression of our opinion, discriminatory application of knowledge with psychological and economically motives and bure­aucratic mentality, if we meet all these in persons that teach the sciences and in researchers: Then, we should think more beyond limits of this question (about the role and reliability of the Science), how many more ineffectual and unreliable is the human thought for the problems in life and society!

 

If an opinion of a madman is correct, then it is correct. We don't downgrades and invalidates, in order to we select hears from a celebrated person and with some ceremonious preparations or be­cause we want a frame with narra­tions for the curious and histori­cal memoirs

 

 

 

 

 

mini bang!

WHY THE CENTRAL IDEA OF THE "BIG BANG" THEORY, IT IS THE BIGGEST FOOLISHNESS IN THE SCIENCE !  READ HERE

www.kosmologia.gr

ENTRY FOR PHYSICISTS

Interpretation & Math investigation

 

 

back next

SHORT ANSWERS - BIG SURPRISES !

 

 

κοσμολογία, cosmology, in German: Kosmologie, in Italian and Portuguese: cosmologia, in France: cosmologie, in Spanish: cosmología, in Russian: космология, in Chinese: 宇宙论, in Hindi: ब्रह्मांड विज्ञान (), in Turkish: kozmoloji, in Swedish and Norwegian: kosmologi, in Arabic: الكوزمولوجيا علم الكونيات , in Hebrew: קוסמולוגיה

φιλοσοφία, philosophy, in German: Philosophie, in Italian and Portuguese: filosofia, in France: philosophie, in Spanish: filosofía, in Russian: философию, in Chinese: 哲学, in Hindi: दर्शन (tattvadnyaan), in Turkish: felsefe, in Swedish and Norwegian: filosofi, in Arabic: الفلسفة , in Hebrew: פילוסופיה

 on 2016-05-23.

 

spacer

 

G = 6,6725 x10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

 

 

M=E/c2 = h / f λ2

 

 

   M = h f μο εο

 

 

V = S / t

 

 

  p = M V = E / V

 

 

aκ = V2 / r

 

 

S = 1/2 a t2

 

 

g = G M / r2

 

 

F = M a

 

 

   a = V2 /λ = λ f2

 

 

V =√GM / r

 

 

Fg = G M1 M2 / r2

 

 

G=c2 / Smax

 

 

zo=50G /μο

 

 

Mmax=Fmax / amin

 

 

c2 / λmin = Gmax

 

 

   c2 = amax λmin  

 

 

   ω = 2 π f = V/ r

 

 

  2π = T Vκ / r 

 

 

  f =ω / 2π =V/2π r

 

 

λmax=amin Tmax2

 

 

 λmax = c2 /amin   

 

 

  amin = c / Tmax

 

 

   amax = c / Tmin

 

 

  c = h / M λ  

 

 

  M=m c / √c2- V2

 

 

L = M V r

 

 

0,73725 x10-50

 

 

cos 90° = 0

 

 

c  G = 0,02

 

 

0,44929 x1019  

 

 

9,10938 x10-31   

 

 

 

1,67262 x10-27 

 

 

 

Mpl2 =h c / G

 

 

 

F r2 = M1M2 G

 

 

 

G = Fλ2 / Mpl2

 

 

 

 

DH / 1Mpc = c / VH

 

 

 

 

parsec~3,086x1016 m

 

 

 

 

.

 

   

© Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis

Edit & Design 2004 - 2014  |  All rights reserved

Best view at 1024x768px | screen 17"minimum | IE v.6.0 +