|
|
h = 6,62606 x 10-34 kg m2 / sec
|
|
|
Relativity of time or energy?
- The big traps of experience - the small explosions of indivisible
space…
|
1986 -
1998 | 2000 - 2008 | 2008 - 2011
COSMOLOGICAL THEORY THAT IS DEVELOPED DAILY, WORD TO WORD, ON 25
YEARS
|
|
 |
IN THE
FIRST PLACE, WE ARE REASONABLE AND SINCERE
|
 |
| |
|
THE BASIS FOR THE EFFECTIVE AND RATIONAL THOUGHTS
ABOUT THE DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION OF THINGS:
THE TWO OPPOSITE PROSPECTS FOR THE RESEARCH OF NATURE
SELECT:
► Do we live in a disruptive
(incoherent) world, without limits, with things that become
until to differ each one from other, without have any common between them, in a
world that has infinite possibilities to happen everything, so that the things are
connected each one from other utterly coincidentally and occasionally with an accidental
assemblage? Do we live in a world where all things change but the stability and
laws are something accidental and casual phenomenon, with the exterior
meeting of many parts and moreover by microscopic molecules?
OR
► do we live in a
world, that has certain decisive limits and consists of things that are always connected with one
and the same reality, such as parts in one and the same total, in an united
world where is
regulated by immutable laws and so the infinite variety of things begins with the
specifications by a common total, without destroys the eternal balance? Do we
live in a chaotic world, where the stability is something accidental or the things change
in a way (periodically, circular, repetitive…)
so as to exist the phenomena of
timing, balance and finally the prospect for things with a constant structure and
existence, and not a chaos of contradictory molecules between them? Do we will hide
the interpretation about the world in some words, so as when we utter the word "form
", that presents the existence of a thing so easy and static ? Or do we will observe,
that the form in the thing is an implementation that becomes with dynamic processes,
in that only one natural and reasonable interpretation can we give in them?
Think simply also with your own
crisis: The formulation of above dilemma with few simple words and abbreviated
shows clearly only two opposite prospects for the human research and meaning of
the life. It will be proved, therefore, that a lot of phenomena which we
believed that they are difficult to explain, these were much more easily and
that on the contrary, in the science have been conquered the solutions in much
difficult questions. Also, it will be proved that until now, the alone reason
for which the research not reveals many answers in the biggest queries, they are
the biases that prevented or did not leave the research to hastened, the
incredible paranoia of the human that influences overall of his behavior and the excessive focus of human thought on the
survival and in the relations of person with other humans. The big dimensions of
the natural world, that is to say the big limits of length and time, serve the
variety of phenomena and the complicated shaping of the things. Nothing other!
It is not only the unforeseen
answer in world queries about the creation of the world. It is not only certain new
discoveries that throw light in dark philosophical and scientific questions,
which remained unanswered on centuries and in particularly questions of newer
physics on many decades. The most unforeseen and astonishing is that the answers
are given unified for a crowd of phenomena, through original and subversive
thoughts which are formulated with the usual vocabulary in some hundreds of pages, with
theoretical observations and analyses of the most general concepts, so as the
ancient philosophers could approach. While, everyone imagined and expected some
volumes with the difficult mathematics and the data processing of a computer!
|
Do
you know, believe or speculate ?
" The knowledge which
be admitted (acceptable) because of insecurity, in order to we do
not appear illiterate, fools or uninformed
(unaware) or for certain other expediency, it is not
our reliable knowledge. It is our faith, it is hasty
certainty or a bet with a lot of probabilities,
however no knowledge that differs from the religious
faith ".
Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
ISBN 978-960-93-2431-1 |
THE COMPLETE UNIVERSE
AND DYNAMICAL FREE
SPACE |
 |
| |
Do we choose an
interpretation about the nature with unknown, rare, unique and
fantastic phenomena (for example, flavour of quark)? Or an interpretation
that begins from the most known,
the most frequent and common phenomena (for example, speed of the motion and
frequency of fluctuation) ?
|
THE ANSWERS ARE OFFERED TO THE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH WITH
WORKADAY LANGUAGE, THAT ALL
PEOPLE CAN TO UNDERSTAND IT AND WITH MATHEMATICAL RELATIONS, IN
WHICH A
STUDENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION IS CAPABLE TO VALIDATE THEM.
THE KNOWLEDGE, THE
MONEY, THE TECHNICAL MEANS, THE RESEARCHERS WERE NOT ABSENT. HOWEVER IT WAS ABSENT, SOMETHING
ELSE MOST ESSENTIAL AND IMPORTANT… IT WAS APPRECIATED FROM THE AUTHOR OF
THE COSMOLOGICAL THEORY (WHERE IT IS SUMMARISED BELOW), IN ORDER TO
IS PROVED THROUGH THE
NATURE ITSELF, HOW IMPORTANT IT IS THIS, THAT WAS ABSENT.
 The
advanced natural
interpretation for the structure of the Universe and matter, with
all those pieces of thought that facilitate exclusively the
comprehension of the cosmological theory and answer with the effective succession
(thread) in the queries that are created, it is formulated in three
books that they seek a sponsor and not in the web pages. In
(digital and printed) books are observed the universal traits and
the fundamental relations of all individual things and in step with
the daily vocabulary, the natural phenomena are described unified,
so as no one up to today have not made it. With the method of
abduction are revealed all the particular relations between of
phenomena, about which we know from the opposite direction of
inductive method, even about very difficulty observed phenomena.
Moreover, the particular relations and the phenomena are
interpreted, because the phenomena come up as conclusions by the
relations and reversely. In the Internet IS NOT presented
exclusively, completed, with cohesion and without unnecessary
thoughts, the natural interpretation for the structure of the
Universe and matter.
|
|
|
 |
|
I ANNOUNCE TO YOU
CERTAIN BIG SURPRISES IN YEAR 2012 ! |
 |
WHAT THEY DID NOT THINK AND DID
NOT GIVE IMPORTANCE...IN THE PHYSICS AND PHILOSOPHY IN THE LAST CENTURIES
THE
MATHEMATICAL MEETING OF PHILOSOPHY WITH THE PHYSICS AND THE SCIENCE
|
An example: Think somebody who is tired, runs many times and makes a lot of
movements in order to achieves what an other person accomplishes rested and
more fast. If we wish the result, then we will be not impressed from what
appears more active and more durable. Example 2nd: Think some employee that
brings many customers and money in your shop, while sits for a long time and
now you think an other employee that runs and tries hardly, but the cash
machine is empty. Who do would you select? Now, apply the same thought for
the scientific research: What the meaning, somebody to solves difficult
equations, describes impressively to us the phenomena and he is capable in
the application of scientific methods, when in order to we understand him,
it will need to we study for a lot of years and after an other researcher
finds the same results and avoids the impasses with the language that
understands any student of medium education !
♪♪♫
|
|
WHY THE CENTRAL IDEA IN THE "BIG BANG" THEORY, IT IS THE BIGGEST
FOOLISHNESS IN THE SCIENCE ! READ HERE
|
|
SHORT ANSWERS - BIG SURPRISES !
ATTENTION !
THEIR PROBLEMS WANT TO BECOME ALSO OUR OWN PROBLEMS
THEY WANT TO HANDLE OUR LIFE IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE IN THEIR AIMS
on
2012-02-03.
|
|
|
G = 6,6725 x10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 |
|
