The cosmological theory about "
the Completed Time and Relativity of Energy ", has been formulated with usual vocabulary and it began is expounded
from an empiric ascertainment, which a lot of philosophers have made it from
ancient years and this also is not accidental. This philosophical
ascertainment, they were forced to make in the science in the last century in
order to they describe the Universe with the theory of Big Explosion. Therefore, the experience shows us that
exist resemblances and common elements in
the things of in-depth space and time.
This means, that through the observation in most near things we can draw
information about the most distant from us and about not visible things.
( In an other relative work I explained easily this our cognitive possibility
and this work accompanies and supplements the cosmological theory, i would
When we place the question about the
beginning of the Universe and substance of things, we can not avoid certain
general significances. We use words such
the Universe, space, time, matter, beginning, finish, movement, action, etc. Certain terms emanate from newer discoveries or were differentiated in the course
of time. Some words such
as, gravity, energy, radiation, field, particle, the matter in greater
detail about its structure and many other words.
These are words, that from first opinion do not appear with the all relations,
that have the one with the other. They did not result theoretically and did
not found fast all together after the growth in some theory, in the head of
only one thinker. The signification of these words became by accidental way and accidental priority. They were used with their most obvious traits and acquired more meanings in the course of time.
The same, so as the bigger part from the vocabulary of our language.
In the sciences, it is the rule they begin with convenient datum a foolishness, that some things are not related from each other.
This happen, because most of discoveries
they have become accidentally, as admit it the experts themselves. It is partiality, we predispose that
things has not relations, after we distinguished and were taught extracting.
Usual case, is lost
precious time until someday the scientists ascertain the opposite with their enthusiasm, after the
accidental (again) discovery of newer phenomena. It is same usual case, they
describe and explain some relations in the field of their speciality and in same moment they use words, that
alone them lead in other
areas of knowledge and they presuppose knowledge outside from their speciality. Separate example of such case, we find in the modern physics.
A lot of scientific discoveries that became by accidental
way, they could have resulted by reasonable
consequence and if we had begun from some different observations.
Innumerable related words express the same thing from
optical corner, with different relations and behavior. Mum for the child, grand mother to the grandchild, girl to her own
parents, woman to the man, person to the animal kingdom, mother by a different word. When we
have watched how becomes one and the
same thing it acts with different ways, to be transformed and to pass from various phases, then the different words they do not tangle us. On the contrary, they reveal to us the possible divergences and their potential interconnections. When, however, we have named differently and accidentally a crowd of things,
without previously we have observed (carefully) all the ways, where those are connected and develop, then the words become delusions.
Similar as thousands mirrors that reflect what we want to approach. Perhaps, the meaning of these words is enough in order to we determine something recognisable and the name it helps in the record keeping. However, it is selected unfoundedly and
is an extract and this causes wrong
impressions, non-existent oppositions, foolish queries and twisted opinions.
This variety in the vocabulary and the thin differences of meanings can inspire the
man of letters and the philosophers and offer exit in their expressiveness. They
cause, however, confusion and manipulation in the reliable compose of our opinions and in the consequence of formulation. Imagine the grammatical and syntactic rules, how many irregular they become for the theoretical research, when they allow we express as one concrete thing, something that really exists only as energy or with more complicated phenomenon
(example, the soul). The same irregular as when we separate the inanimate things in male and in female gender or when
the irrelevant things have a similar name.
One from the more especial examples about inconsistency with lightly use of
significances in the Science is the use of term “force”, with implied the
infinite speed transmission of the force. In the particular case, we
see not only unfounded acceptance for infinite speed. We still see, that the
experience can deceit us, when the significance of a term emanates from
unknown phenomena and when it's not easy they are measured. From the lightly
acceptance about the infinite speed in transmission of the force, the
physics fell in adventures. The scientists discover with big delay and with
surprise the inaccuracy in previous theories, that was blindly acceptable over centuries.
The types and the calculations, that are relative with the transmission or
exertion of force are not reliable for the correct description of the phenomena,
if the speed or acceleration is infinite and still are corrected.
In the cosmological theory (in first phase) about the “Finished Time” happens the following simple and
When we look carefully in few general words (the total, parts, change, relation, cause,
result, time, etc) and we try to understand in more
detail what they mean, then we reveal very important and
suspect coincidences. These different and ostensibly irrelevant usual words
they can be described more analytically and be replaced from other expressions and other formulation,
with necessary relations and not randomly.
THE PHILOSOPHY FOUND THE MATHEMATICS
The end of thread, the beginning for the revelation of their common elements and their relations are found when in the abstract word “Universe” we differentiate the definition and we attribute a wider significance. When with the word “Universe” we in general include and vaguely
the total of the things from the past until the future and not only that exists in our present. If in this definition of
the Universe, we add and say that the Universe is one and same in the limits of biggest total time
(in one period), this opinion is the key for the explanation of all big questions of philosophy!
Somebody would say, that with this
way we cannot find some relation between of things, which we did not know it
It would still say, that we find what we seek, without consequence in our
thought. When, however, we begin the analysis of the signification of a small number and little
expressions and we
connect them again in the basis of the wider definition of the Universe (as a total of things, from the all years), then we reveal relations and
traits, which had not passed from our head. We conclude known theories
through other course of search, we resolve unsolvable problems and coincide with
empiric ascertainments. After the long-lasting treatment and growth of
formulations, a lot of coincidences, the clues and the consequences lead to
the conclusion, that rather it is improbable are connected all these
accidental. Usually, when the coincidences are excessively many and in difficult cases
particularly and when the all pieces suit, then we suspect
the existence of some cause. The explanation for the coincidence and the not
accidental fitting is what we name “truth”.
It's not accidental, that the human can think and shape opinions about
things that exceed their experience, for most distant, biggest and smallest,
about invisible and about the Universe. The philosophers were not so
much deluded and was not so headstrong, as long as they appears from their
inconsistencies, the errors and their difference opinions. On the contrary,
it is usual in the scientific area to become some ascertainments about a smaller number of things
than as long as it is allowed or are discovered some relations between
things, for which we had predisposed that they are not connected. The
sequence, the way and the time where became a lot of scientific discoveries was not
this only, the unavoidable,
from the sudden intuition of few pioneers.
In order to somebody watches and understand the cosmological theory about
Universe he should has a summary knowledge about the structure of
matter, also some acquaintance in the Physics. Apart from the familiarization
with the philosophy, we needs this briefing in order to we can think more
exempted from the biases, that have taken shape from the habit of our daily
When we speak about the total of things and attempt to give total
explanations, we will be not reported in separate and multifunctional things,
that are found near us and nowhere elsewhere. That is to say, it not helps
us and it will not be the shortest street if we speak about some plants, the
specifications of some cars, geophysical map of earth, about the city where we live
or about the wine. The development of human knowledge has
revealed certain phenomena and elements, which are widespread and more frequent means in the nature. These are found in bigger number of things and in
longer time intervals,
for example as they are the structure of chemical substances.
The discovery of resemblances and common elements in the entirety
of things does not astonish the philosophers
and the theoretical thought about the existence of structural elements is
not an accidental thought. On the contrary, for a lot of researchers,
theorists and thinkers, this was something expected, from ancient years. We
find many attempts for description of Universe from the
most ancient years. Of course, some of
these led to astonishing opinions and approached in modern scientific discoveries.
The cosmological theory about Simultaneous Universe is one still such attempt, with an
original way, which exploited the newest discoveries of Physics. Seeing that
description for the total of things
and the general explanations are reported in their common elements and in common phenomena, we
should use abstract significations and
expressions, such as are the time, the effect, the change and whichever other are essential in order
to we are reported condensed in its entirety of things that are related. We still expect, the general
significations are met with
significations that describe common elements and phenomena in the specific
area of the Physics or even other sciences. Does not exist nothing the strange in this coincidence and is not absurd nor antiscientific
this indiscriminate and overall way.
Therefore, whoever wants learns and
watches the theory about the
Simultaneous and Completed Universe (alternative title of the theory), he/she
needs knows an elementary theory from the Physics. It need yet,
somehow to imagine the dynamic structure of matter
and the crowd of different things, as if they was compositions by similar constitutive elements (and not only grossly, on the surface and
Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis