Thoughts from a new start and about a beginning... Earth

***                                                                              comet

* HOME |     | ABOUT |     | FIND THE EXIT! |     | COSMOS & LIFE |     | COSMOLOGY








For creatively thinking!





The cosmological theory about " the Completed Time and Relativity of Energy ", has been formulated with usual vocabulary and it began is expounded drawing strength from an empiric ascertainment, which a lot of philosophers have made it from ancient years and this also is not accidental. This philosophical ascertainment, they were forced to make in the science in the last century in order to they describe the Universe with the theory of Big Explosion. Therefore, the experience shows us that exist resemblances and common elements in the things of in-depth space and time. This means, that through the observation in most near things we can draw information about the most distant from us and about not visible things. ( In an other relative work I explained easily this our cognitive possibility and this work accompanies and supplements the cosmological theory, i would say ).


When we place the question about the beginning of the Universe and substance of things, we can not avoid certain general significances. We use words such as the Universe, space, time, matter, beginning, finish, movement, action, etc. Certain terms emanate from newer discoveries or were differentiated in the course of time. Some words such as, gravity, energy, radiation, field, particle, the matter in greater detail about its structure and many other words.

These are words, that from first opinion do not appear with the all relations, that have the one with the other. They did not result theoretically and did not found fast all together after the growth in some theory, in the head of only one thinker. The signification of these words became by accidental way and accidental priority. They were used with their most obvious traits and acquired more meanings in the course of time. The same, so as the bigger part from the vocabulary of our language.

In the sciences, it is the rule they begin with convenient datum a foolishness, that some things are not related from each other. This happen, because most of discoveries they have become accidentally, as admit it the experts themselves. It is partiality, we predispose that things has not relations, after we distinguished and were taught extracting. Usual case, is lost precious time until someday the scientists ascertain the opposite with their enthusiasm, after the accidental (again) discovery of newer phenomena. It is same usual case, they describe and explain some relations in the field of their speciality and in same moment they use words, that alone them lead in other areas of knowledge and they presuppose knowledge outside from their speciality. Separate example of such case, we find in the modern physics. A lot of scientific discoveries that became by accidental way, they could have resulted by reasonable consequence and if we had begun from some different observations.

Innumerable related words express the same thing from an other optical corner, with different relations and behavior. Mum for the child, grand mother to the grandchild, girl to her own parents, woman to the man, person to the animal kingdom, mother by a different word. When we have watched how becomes one and the same thing it acts with different ways, to be transformed and to pass from various phases, then the different words they do not tangle us. On the contrary, they reveal to us the possible divergences and their potential interconnections. When, however, we have named differently and accidentally a crowd of things, without previously we have observed (carefully) all the ways, where those are connected and develop, then the words become delusions. Similar as thousands mirrors that reflect what we want to approach. Perhaps, the meaning of these words is enough in order to we determine something recognisable and the name it helps in the record keeping. However, it is selected unfoundedly and is an extract and this causes wrong impressions, non-existent oppositions, foolish queries and twisted opinions.


This variety in the vocabulary and the thin differences of meanings can inspire the man of letters and the philosophers and offer exit in their expressiveness. They cause, however, confusion and manipulation in the reliable compose of our opinions and in the consequence of formulation. Imagine the grammatical and syntactic rules, how many irregular they become for the theoretical research, when they allow we express as one concrete thing, something that really exists only as energy or with more complicated phenomenon (example, the soul). The same irregular as when we separate the inanimate things in male and in female gender or when the irrelevant things have a similar name.


One from the more especial examples about inconsistency with lightly use of significances in the Science is the use of term “force”, with implied the infinite speed transmission of the force. In the particular case, we see not only unfounded acceptance for infinite speed. We still see, that the experience can deceit us, when the significance of a term emanates from unknown phenomena and when it's not easy they are measured. From the lightly acceptance about the infinite speed in transmission of the force, the physics fell in adventures. The scientists discover with big delay and with surprise the inaccuracy in previous theories, that was blindly acceptable over centuries. The types and the calculations, that are relative with the transmission or exertion of force are not reliable for the correct description  of the phenomena, if the speed or acceleration is infinite and still are corrected. 


In the cosmological theory (in first phase) about the “Finished Time” happens the following simple and astonishing ascertainment. When we look carefully in few general words (the total, parts, change, relation, cause, result, time, etc) and we try to understand in more detail what they mean, then we reveal very important and suspect coincidences. These different and ostensibly irrelevant usual words they can be described more analytically and be replaced from other expressions and other formulation, with necessary relations and not randomly.




The end of thread, the beginning for the revelation of their common elements and their relations are found when in the abstract word “Universe” we differentiate the definition and we attribute a wider significance. When with the word “Universe” we in general include and vaguely the total of the things from the past until the future and not only that exists in our present. If in this definition of the Universe, we add and say that the Universe is one and same in the limits of biggest total time (in one period), this opinion is the key for the explanation of all big questions of philosophy!



Somebody would say, that with this way we cannot find some relation between of things, which we did not know it already.[1]   It would still say, that we find what we seek, without consequence in our thought. When, however, we begin the analysis of the signification of a small number and little expressions and we connect them again in the basis of the wider definition of the Universe (as a total of things, from the all years), then we reveal relations and traits, which had not passed from our head. We conclude known theories through other course of search, we resolve unsolvable problems and coincide with empiric ascertainments. After the long-lasting treatment and growth of formulations, a lot of coincidences, the clues and the consequences lead to the conclusion, that rather it is improbable are connected all these accidental. Usually, when the coincidences are excessively many and in difficult cases particularly and when the all pieces suit, then we suspect the existence of some cause. The explanation for the coincidence and the not accidental fitting is what we name “truth”.


 It's not accidental, that the human can think and shape opinions about things that exceed their experience, for most distant, biggest and smallest, about invisible and about the Universe. The philosophers were not so much deluded and was not so headstrong, as long as they appears from their inconsistencies, the errors and their difference opinions. On the contrary, it is usual in the scientific area to become some ascertainments about a smaller number of things than as long as it is allowed or are discovered some relations between things, for which we had predisposed that they are not connected. The sequence, the way and the time where became a lot of scientific discoveries was not this only, the unavoidable, from the sudden intuition of few pioneers.



In order to somebody watches and understand the cosmological theory about the Simultaneous Universe he should has a summary knowledge about the structure of matter, also some acquaintance in the Physics. Apart from the familiarization with the philosophy, we needs this briefing in order to we can think more exempted from the biases, that have taken shape from the habit of our daily experience.  

When we speak about the total of things and attempt to give total explanations, we will be not reported in separate and multifunctional things, that are found near us and nowhere elsewhere. That is to say, it not helps us and it will not be the shortest street if we speak about some plants, the specifications of some cars, geophysical map of earth, about the city where we live or about the wine. The development of human knowledge has revealed certain phenomena and elements, which are widespread and more frequent means in the nature. These are found in bigger number of things and in longer time intervals, for example as they are the structure of chemical substances.

The discovery of resemblances and common elements in the entirety of things does not astonish the philosophers and the theoretical thought about the existence of structural elements is not an accidental thought. On the contrary, for a lot of researchers, theorists and thinkers, this was something expected, from ancient years. We find many attempts for description of Universe from the most ancient years. Of course, some of these led to astonishing opinions and approached in modern scientific discoveries.


The cosmological theory about Simultaneous Universe is one still such attempt, with an original way, which exploited the newest discoveries of Physics. Seeing that description for the total of things and the general explanations are reported in their common elements and in common phenomena, we should use abstract significations and expressions, such as are the time, the effect, the change and whichever other are essential in order to we are reported condensed in its entirety of things that are related. We still expect, the general significations are met with significations that describe common elements and phenomena in the specific area of the Physics or even other sciences. Does not exist nothing the strange in this coincidence and is not absurd nor antiscientific this indiscriminate and overall way.

Therefore, whoever wants learns and watches the theory about the Simultaneous and Completed Universe (alternative title of the theory), he/she needs knows an elementary theory from the Physics. It need yet, somehow to imagine the dynamic structure of matter and the crowd of different things, as if they was compositions by similar constitutive elements (and not only grossly, on the surface and piecemeal).[2]



Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis



The theory ... with all details




[1] The possibility of revealing unknown relations in the things through the analysis some significances, I have explained this in an other short survey. See here:...

[2] Sensory do not show us immediately the all details and the all ways of connection between the things. Often they show us combinations and traits that are not their basic elements or exist concerning only with some things.



© 2004-2018 Konstant G. Nikol - All rights reserved


THE THEOLOGY        http://www.kosmologia.gr             SCIENCE            






Best view at 1024x768px | screen 15" - 19" | IE v.6.0 - 8.0 | Minimum screen diagonal 7" / 960px
Other suggested browsers: Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, MS Edge, Safari. Codepages windows-1252, iso-8859-1