Thoughts from a new start and about a beginning... Earth

***                                                                              comet

* HOME |     | ABOUT |     | FIND THE EXIT! |     | COSMOS & LIFE |     | COSMOLOGY








For creatively thinking!





An initial observation: The word " Universe " is compound and it simply means, the total of everything, that is to say all what they exist. This definition does not prohibit us, we accompany the word " Universe " with an adjective as the words " complete " , " full " , or we say more stressed " the total of the Universe ". The signification in the word " Universe " is reported in something unique, that it distinguishes from each particular thing. The word " Universe " or phrase " the total of all that they exist " these not so much explicit, so as rather we believe, and all humans will not think precisely the same, when they hear this word. It isn't immediately obvious what we mean with words " things " and if in the significance about word " total ", we include the multitude of exterior things as a sum or if we include moreover our dreams, our thoughts, the movements of the things and something other. From the initial and " enormously" significance about the Universe, we leave outside the precision of its definition and we open the possibility to think somehow otherwise, when we will determine more precisely the most general significations, as they are the " existence " and " thing ". Then, the philosophers and the modern researchers have formulated so many theories about the nature, the world and the Universe and up to absurdity, therefore obligatorily we should stress or clarify the meanings that are obvious and logical for a lot of people.


One of the more ancient and popular biases in the human history, takes shape when we hear the simple word " Universe ", that is to say entire the world, the everything, the total of all things. The truth of our smallness with criterion our geometric dimensions, leads the thought to a generalized opinion for our smallness in all other our attributes and the faculties. The generalized opinion about our total smallness in contrariety to an infinity Universe it chain our thoughts and discourages the exploratory thought, same as happens with our opinion about God. The alone persons in the history, which they dared to make thoughts in order to comprehend the wider world are the Philosophers. This bias constituted an obstacle in the historical growth of entire Science. After this bias the thought was chopped in the most direct and nearest phenomena which we can observe them, without the conscience and the knowledge of their unity and deeper interconnection (into phenomena) and about the common beginning that conditions the different phenomena. Furthermore, downgrading the role of abstractive thought for the approach in experience and for the simple observation. The " concrete " was identified as the " visible " and the " constant " while the " abstract " is considered as the " invisible " and " fantastic ", in a diametrically opposition, that is to say.


Ought it causes a big impression, even that in the science they can to tell us about the Universe entirely, while REMOVING THE BIGGER NUMBER OF THINGS THAT THIS CONTAINS. We say "Universe" , that is to say everything, the all things that exist and which never no one will not measure, neither no one will know all that. We seek to know the "Universe" , that is to say something that appears like infinity. If we knew the all things that the Universe contains, then we would be " gods ". It paradoxically happens, we speak more easily about the Universe and it is more difficult we understand the human society, which the Universe includes. Because the Universe is a total Universe, for this reason we can be reported in its entirety of things without we speak about no one particularly. On the contrary, is required… we know less number of things and not most! KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT EXPERIENCE? NO!

We can speak about some experience which we do not have and this possibility emanates from the experience, by the median of some significations (of words), that can emanate from a minimal number of perceptions (or observations), but correspond and find itself in much bigger number. For example, when we say, that the human has two legs, this is truth not only for those who we have perceived - this it is our real experience - but also for innumerable other humans, present and absentees.

A multitude of accidental and fragmentary ascertainments in the experience and a multitude from separate explanations can be revealed more fast, easily and no accidentally. They can through the growth and the correlation of few concise opinions and usual significances and with our possibility we know the all things through the discovery of relations and resemblances in nearest things of our experience.

From the analysis of a few words and meanings that are reported in widespread physical phenomena (for example, the light, the time, the movement) and such as these are connected from each other and with the simple logic on the common experience, we can approach to correct answers and to well-aimed approaches round scientific questions. Because if we reject or change their correct meanings or say a foolery, then we will be led in absurdities and in foolish impasses! Many of the scientific observations that became by accidental way, they could have resulted with reasonable consequence and if we had begun from different observations.


A biggest biases in the science and more generally of the human is the opinion, that the observation in the particular things and the attempt to describe the things with clarity ensures us more knowledge. Not only, this does not ensures more knowledge but simultaneously it increases the ignorance and it presupposes we make the error to remove things, which we consider them arbitrarily that are not connected. That is to say, concrete = piecemeal, extracted and removing at will. In the daily life and in the science, we remove things and relations accommodatingly, for reasons to we succeed simplification and priority, anticipating what is related more immediately and what indirectly. We are reported in the "concrete" things without we know well what precisely it needs we remove, also what are the details, but because thus it facilitates to us and because we needed to begin from somewhere, for inquiring aims or in order to we can live. When we report concrete things, in the same moment automatically we remove the total of reality and possibilities, it could easily say someone, and this usually we make without conscience. We cannot think about something unknown and about things, which do not fall in our perception, while when we can make some thought, then with difficulty this is proved correct. Difficult it is not only the survival but also the correct and precise thought on our information!



I read this in the pages of www.kosmologia.gr








Did they wonder in the modern cosmology, how complete can be a physical interpretation about the Universe, such as the one that they dream, when it doesn't offer the minimal knowledge in order to is explained the presence of life in to the Universe? The cosmological theories that have been formulated with mathematics and are considered prevailing theories, they do not open any street to this direction of nature. This theoretical impasse, the physicists would be supposed to understand it more as responsible scientists, and they do not leave the problem unsolvable or for answer from the theology.


See more:







THE physical interpretation AND MATHEMATIC INVESTIGATION  



Do not forget, the world where we found it offers us itself the possibility to becomes concisely and abstract known and to be described in general, even in to field of sciences and particularly with the application of mathematics



© 2004-2018 Konstant G. Nikol - All rights reserved


THE THEOLOGY        http://www.kosmologia.gr             SCIENCE            






Best view at 1024x768px | screen 15" - 19" | IE v.6.0 - 8.0 | Minimum screen diagonal 7" / 960px
Other suggested browsers: Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, MS Edge, Safari. Codepages windows-1252, iso-8859-1