*

THE COMPLETE COSMOS & THE MATTER  /  THE SELF-REGULATING UNIVERSE & THE LIFE

Thoughts from a new start and about a beginning... Earth

***                                                                              comet

* HOME |     | ABOUT |     | FIND THE EXIT! |     | COSMOS & LIFE |     | COSMOLOGY

*

KNOWLEDGE &THINKING     |      MAN & SOCIETY     |     THE BOOKS     |      PHILOSOPHERS

message

DECEPTION

?

 

For creatively thinking!


 

Attention! Exist translational errors

Timaeus in the famous dialogue of Plato. The human logic 24 centuries ago  WITHOUT EXPERIENCE :

" At my opinion therefore it should at first we determine the following: what is that which exists always but it does not be born never, and what is born always but never exists. The first thing, somebody can  comprehend logically thinking, because this is always the itself. The second somebody can perceives it without thought, as opinion and belief because it is born and is lost, however it does not exist really, never "

(about Timaeus look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timaeus_(dialogue)

 

The human logic after 24 centuries WITH SCIENTIFIC EXPERIENCE :

" Entire the world with the space was condensed in an adimensional point. Without cause and logic, an adimensional point that contained the all world in infinite density changed (Big Bang) and thus created the space with dimensions, the energy and the natural laws that determine the development at initial situation of fiery plasma."

 

We cannot speak about progress in the thought.

The regression in the ancient season of mythology, it is more likely.

However our ancient ancestors had enormous ignorance and now we comprehend and admire their imagination. On the contrary, in our season the knowledge and heritage of human thought are enormous and we do not comprehend and we consider that it is a delirium.

 

In newer years, the philosopher Spinoza (1632-1677) in his theology, theorem 3: "The things that do not have nothing the common between them, no one from these it cannot be a reason for the other ".

 

"It doesn't exist ether, it doesn't ab­solute motion and point for reference, but only related motions for observers", Ein­stein claims and literally since then they have bewilder us in order to we accept these dark opinions. Nevertheless, the re­lativity of the time and length in the in­quiring field of Physics, did not prevent the researchers to speak globally about the things, to count the distances between galaxies and the age of the Universe. They say to us that does not exist an absolute time or a common point for report on the measurement of time. Without they under­stand well, they say to us abstra­ctedly, the time is relative. These their opinions do not prevent to speak about an age of the universe, that is to say about a time inter­val which is common for the all things…The speed limit of the light, does not a common limit for the multitude of different things (where are moved with different speeds comparatively from each other) and for the multitude of changes in the pheno­mena, if not for the Universe entire?

 

1

The definition of word "Universe" in the 21st century  

 

The research for the origin of world, the observation of sky, the scripts and the thoughts about the world beyond our planet and how can be this world are charmed a lot of persons always and today constitute particularly attractive questions for commercial aims. We can find abundant info­rmation and thoughts about the Universe, however here we will stand in the general definition about the Universe, so as it give careful, according to the scientific observations. It is impressive the rese­mblance of definition that is formulated in most cases, after it is not easy for the anyone to express his own opinions or he is incurious about Universe. If somebody does not want is ridiculed and on the contrary wants to says something that it has ascertained from the researchers, in this case is better to repeats what he heard or reads.

 

We will take as a sample the definition about the Universe, that we find in the electronic ency­clopedia Wiki­pedia, in Greek and in English publi­cation. Follows the general definition in Greek publi­cation (11/7/09) :

 

" With word "Universe" we mean, in the vernacular, the total of things that existed, they exist or they will exist, that is to say the total of beings. More specifically, saying Universe in the science we mean usually entire space-time continuous, as well as the total of matter and energy  ".

 

Little below :

" We can fix, with bigger safety, that :

Universe is the total sum of existing matter and energy.

The universe is not neither “shapeless” neither “infinite”, but it has ends. In first view, this is difficulty acceptable, but the fact is that the researches of last fifty-year period they converge in this opinion, that is to say the Universe is limited. First led to this conclusion the German-Jew physicist A. Einstein (1879-1955), when he proposed the Theory of relativity.

Thus we lead to consider that the form of Universe is hyperball, most likely.

Hyperball is named the ball, where the radius is altered continuously in the time. This means that the Universe resembles with balloon where it is inflated and expanded in the time. This dilation is continued by creation of the Universe up to today ".

 

SHORT OBSERVATIONS

This usual definition about the Universe in the 21st century does not make something else apart from repeats with more words, what expresses the unique word, so as it defi­ned in the brief explanatory dictionaries. The uni­ver­se is the everything and accordingly it includes each what every­where in the space and time. Somehow thus the humans was thinking in the ancient years and be­cause they didn't consider the things well distin­guished, they preferred to call the unified presence of world with some other words and, with few imagi­nation, they approa­ched also in the concept "God".

 

 

If we observe the words in definition about the Universe, with few bad faith we can show how many shallow is this thought in the science. Eg. "con­tinuum" it means lack of discontinuity? Do not stick in this. In this definition about the Uni­verse, we will still observe the usual exclusion of all centuries that preceded from the season of Al. Einstein. Because the modern scientists do not consider as knowledge, when this emanated from local obser­vations and from reasonable thoughts, with the minimal means that allocated oldest. They selected their own obser­vations, that make with more modern methods, with more complicated instru­ments and about far objects.

 

We will not lose our time with analyzing the meanings and will not miss the object of our report about the definition for the Universe. Remark only a query:

In the 21st century we sit down and read a children's (general) definition about the Universe, when in the philosophy has been recorded this same definition a lot of centuries ago and in certain cases, with more accuracy! If the inflation of free space and the word "hyperball" they constitute new discoveries in order to is supple­mented the general definition about the Universe, then the philo­sophical imagi­nation is not absent nor from the current science. After of so much scientific careful thought in order to is not said some­thing that is not certain and once again the scientists did not avoid their ima­gination!

 

We go to the general definition that we find (11/7/09)  in the English publication of famous Wiki­pedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe ):

 

" The Universe is defined as everything that physically exists: the entirety of space and time, all forms of matter, energy and momentum, and the physical laws and constants that govern them ".

 

In the short English formulation we will observe that in the significance of the Universe it includes a main trait, something where it escaped from the first lines in Greek publication: the natural laws and the numerical constants. Particularly impor­tant obser­vation and more advanced proposal on definition. Because the Universe is not simply a number of things and exchange of energy from each other. There are restrictions, coercions and con­ditions that they do not emanate from indi­vidual and concrete things. These emanate from the form of the total of things and from the exis­tence of the total things, that it is preceded from the presence of the individual and occasional things.

 

The "natural laws" and " numerical constants" perhaps they bring different thoughts, however real­ly they are common phrases that hide some big an­swers. Without these an­swers the natural laws remain simple thoughts, that have become from a lot of centuries ago and do not add nothing new in the definition about the Universe, such as we find in the magazines and in the books of 21st century.

 

 

This stagnation and the lack of progress in the general definition about the Universe be­tray the enormous ignorance and the mis­inter­pretation that prevails in the modern cosmology. Of course, in the philosophy we can find the same reasonable thought for the Universe with more careful formulation and with better pro­spect for the research.

 

 

Universe: The common total of all things from the all moments and COMPLETE in the same (wide) moment, where it remains incomplete and in deve­lopment for the individual materially things.

The complete Universe is always itself in the limits of a biggest time interval and the creation becomes permanently through the structure of matter. The matter constitutes the minimal mo­ments of befo­rehand completed reality in the limits of a biggest time period (common time [Tuni). The complete Universe of in its entirety time exists relatively such as a finite free space and as con­stant quantity of energy for what they can happen by the material carriers (particles). The total prede­termines the biggest and minimal limits (of length, time and energy) in  interactions between them. The world that is absent participates in the energy of material world through the micro­scopic structure of matter with the form of finite, but dynamic free space.

 

 If the Universe were not constant in a total time in order to is the full energy like a constant qua­ntity, then the change of energy in the smaller time moments (between the parts) would become with unlimited way (in any quantity and independent from an unit of time). The energy would always be incomplete and, in the share would be constants by chance. In this case, it would not exists the minimal quantity of time tmin = λmin / Vmax neither a highest frequency fmax.

 

 

 

The Universe in the cosmological theory under the title "Complete or Finished Time" is self-­existent, because with simple words, the Universe is present, immutable and “compact” in the limits of a biggest total time - and about this reason it is real “imme­diately”. In other words, the full Universe exists simulta­neously and the directness coin­cides with the inwardness. The elaboration of this ostensibly absurd and contradictory idea lead us to incredibly reasonable conse­quences and OPENS the STREET FOR the CONNECTION of PHYSICS AND COSMO­LOGY WITH the OTHER SCIENCES !

 

 

 

 

What does say this theory ?

 

                      circular time              

 

THE "MISSED" MASS AND RELATIONS OF PHYSICS INTO PHILOSOPHY ►

The currently cosmology   

An article with the occasion from a public speaking of the compatriot, the famous physicist and researcher... (in Greek language)  

 

 

e-mail

© 2004-2013 Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis - All rights reserved

 

THE THEOLOGY        http://www.kosmologia.gr             SCIENCE            

OF

 HOME PAGE

 

ABOUT

clock

Best view at 1024x768px | screen 17"minimum | IE v.6.0 +