



CIRCULAR TIME – COMPLETE & SIMULTANEOUS
UNIVERSE
Theory about a completed time and the relativity of energy
(An unified theory about time,
space and matter)
The close
relation between the mass and speed of electromagnetic
waves (2)
©2010 ISBN9789609324311
 ©2012 ISBN9789609340403

Attention! Many translational errors are
exist.
We can and calculate acceleration
±a, the time t, the length λ or l, the frequency f
on the base of a maximum limit of speed Vmax (that appears coincide with light
c), without the object M that is moved and accelerated and without the
relation of object M with some force F, from which it receives the
energy. That is to say, we have types as follow :
λ f^{2} =
V^{2} /λ = V/t = a , V =λ f =
λ /t = a t , V^{2} = a λ ,
tmin = 1/ fmax → tmax = 1/ fmin,
t =V / a =
λ/ V , ω = V/r = 2π f
and with children's logic without we
know the limits in the numerical values, we can import the biggest and minimal
limits max and min in general.
However, the force F (kg m /s^{2})
and momentum p (kg m/s) in their units contain quantity kg (mass M)
that belong in the object, which we can ignore for the
experiments in our thought. If, however, the object which is
accelerated does created of some motion in most microscopic
dimensions and it doesn't exist in advance as independent, so as a multitude of phenomena
show us and the simple logic? Any
physicist on a lot of deadend decades didn't attempt a such logical case, the mass in the structure
of matter is something that is caused or created by phenomena of motion,
without the presence of mass, such as the mass that we perceive in our visible world.
The Newtonian definition for the mass, already allow us we
attempt an
enlargement of this definition. In the Newton's season were unknown the role of electromagnetism in the
nature and the presence of electromagnetic waves everywhere in the nature, as an
attributive piece
of world, which we do not observe it (same as the material bodies), but it does not constitutes
a
lack of substance and reality. The blind and formal use of term " mass "
thenceforth, it
led to impasses, it prevented the progress of physics and a lot of
scientists was said many fooleries. Albert Einstein, where proves the relation
between mass
with an equivalent quantity of energy (E=
M c^{2})
and his theories of relativity left open the field for the
scientists deprived from imagination to think mathematically
about the relativity of length and time, he made an enormous
jump. No other physicist was found to make a proportional achieved jump. The
next jump in the physics is the unification between phenomenon of mass with the
electromagnetism and naturally the last phenomenon with the gravity.
The unification
about phenomenon of mass
with the electromagnetism begins when we reveal the close relation of this
phenomenon with the motion in general. It begins with the
thought that the inertia and mass are phenomena that are
inherent in the signification of the broad phenomenon of motion (as a
relation of change in time and length) and when we
formulate the first relations mathematically, that are confirmed
after we apply
them in order to we describe the microscopic particles and the
structure of matter. Then, the search what is the motion with
which are caused the particles, or what is a motion without matter and particles,
does not exist other logical answer, from the presence of void (free) space and the
wave change that is caused in its balanced energy…
The
constant
M λm
= 2,21021 x10^{42}
kg·m in accordance with well known physics, does not mean, nothing. It expresses
theoretically a mass in multiplication with a vague length and nothing other. When,
however, we interpret the particles, that have a relevant mass M such as products of
speed, motion and change of length and time, then the constant
M λm
=
2,21021 x10^{42} kg·m
get an interest and more importance.

The mass (M) is fixed by
the relation of force (F) with the change in a motion (M=F/a).
If the motion is caused by null initial speed or if the motion
becomes with a
constant speed and this is altered, the relation
F/a
remains and the result continues expressing a mass and a phenomenon of inertia.
In other words, the mass expresses a particular case in the change of speed
and that is resisted in this change or the time delay until
the change becomes and
completed. With the continual application of same force F, the body
with bigger mass M will need more time t in order
to it acquires the maximum speed Vmax comparatively to the body of smaller mass. With same force
F, as long as more time needs, so much bigger is the mass and on the contrary
(M=F t/V).
If the increase of speed does not exceed
a limit Vmax, thus with a clean reasoning a biggest limit in the
change of speed (± amax) results, that is to say, in how much
fast can the speed increases or decreases itself. In other words
results a limit in the acceleration and deceleration ±a. Parcel with
these relations goes also the force, after does not exist force
which causes faster speed than a biggest limit neither faster
change of speed in infinite small time interval. If therefore,
the mass is considered more widely as a phenomenon of change in
the motion with the
proportional reaction or delay in this change (change, which is obviously caused by
some force or by the perturbation of certain balanced forces), thus simply and
with the consequence of reasonings, it results that the mass cannot increases
unlimitedly. The inertia, the reaction in the change of
motion or the delay owe
to have also them a biggest limit (Mmax), as it has the change of speed (±
amax). Because in the case of creation of matter and mass of particles, the
force F isn't obviously exterior and applied from an other clean phenomenon of
a
mass and the force is " inwrought " with the structure of matter, we cannot say
immediately what is the relation of their limits, based on the
Newton's type, who
described an exterior relation and evident between a body and the force.
In the physics, the
dimensional content in force F contains unit of mass (that is to say kg).
If however, the mass is a phenomenon that is caused more
generally by the change of the (wave) motion and from the
maintenance or repetition of this change, then the mass
is not a different phenomenon comparably itself the motion, the
speed and force.
The mass in the microscopic space is the result of a combination of these phenomena,
when they are altered. The mass such as it is fixed by the optical description of
an uncreated situation and existence in the nature, it is presented itself as a
separate and selfexistent phenomenon with hidden the permanent relation,
that the mass has with the phenomenon of motion and change
always. 
Because the inertia and mass are phenomena that are inherent in the significance of motion, the mass
can be varied in proportion to the change in the motion and with the change in the sizes of other related phenomena, but also it dependent of
the limit that is inserted by the limit in speed. In our calculations, are need the same terms in all phenomena.
We see at the following left types,
the length λ does result since types that include mass Μ and
since types that does not include mass Μ. How would to be solved so that we find mass Μ ?
The simpler relations of physics,
which use the most capable researchers in order to they solve the most tangled
mathematic problems and in order to find solutions in the impasses of modern
physics, these relations should they had been supplemented and they had
been delimited by the professionals physicists. A lot of decades were
lost and now, a philosopher reveals, that the
simpler types of physics could be supplemented from
a student of medium education! With a short
thought (for example, does not exist an infinity of things), which it could
say even one insane man, results consequences in the science where specialise
itself the physicists and astronomers. If they began in their offhand exercise
book with a simple supposition, as they make often, they would lead in important
observations and they would open the impasse in the physics and mathematic
interpretation about the structure of matter and Universe.




BASIC DATA THAT WE HAVE ACCORDING TO THE PHYSICS

[] 
BASIC DATA THAT WE HAVE ACCORDING TO THE
PHYSICS
Me
= h / c λe = h f / c^{2}
= 9,10938 x10^{31}
kg

Mp
= h / c λp
= h f / c^{2}
= 1,672621 x10^{27} kg

Ee
= Me c^{2} = h fe
= 81,871 x10^{15} J
=
0,510998 MeV

Ep
= h fp = Mp
c^{2} = 15,032765 x10^{11}J
=
938,272 MeV

fe
= Ee / h = M c^{2} /
h = 12,3559 x10^{19}
Hz

fp
= Ep / h = M c^{2} /
h = 2,2687335 x10^{23}
Hz

te
= 1/ fe = 0,080933 x10^{19}
sec

tp
= 1/fp = 0,4407745 x10^{23}
sec

λe
= c / fe = h / M c = 0,24263 x10^{11}
m

λp
= c / fp = h / M c = 1,3214086 x10^{15}
m

ae
= λe fe^{2}
= c^{2}/λe = 37,04209 x10^{27}
m/s^{2}

ap
= λp fp^{2}
= c^{2}/λp = 6,801491 x10^{31}
m/s^{2} = c fp

Fe
= Ee / λe
= Me ae
= 337,431 x10^{4} N

Fp
= Ep / λp
= Mp ap
= 11,376318 x10^{4} N

pe
= Fe te
= Me c
= 27,3093 x10^{23}

pp
= Fp tp
= Mp c
= 5,014391 x10^{19}



±e = 1,602176462 x10^{19}
(cb και 1eV)

c = 1/√ μο
εο
= 2,997924 x10^{8}
m/sec

r_{e} = 0,28179367
x10^{14} m (radius
of orbit in simple atom)

G = 6,6725 x10^{11}
m^{3} / kg sec^{2}

π = 3,14159


α =
2π re
/ λe
= 7,29737 x10^{3}

h = 6,62606 x10^{34}
kg m^{2} / sec (J
x sec) 
Boltzmann
(k) = 1,38065 x10^{23} Joule/k)

hbar
= h / 2π

Mp
/ Me
= 0,183615 x10^{4}

μο
= 4π x 10^{7} = 12,56636 x10^{7} Henry / m

F_{ηλ} = k
e^{2} / r_{e}^{2}
= E_{e} / r_{e}
= 29,05356 N

εο
= 1 / 36π x 10^{9} = 8,854 x10^{12} Farad / m

k = 8,987551787 x 10^{9}
Ν m^{2}/Cb^{2} = 1 / 4π εο

zo
= √μο
/εο
= μο c = 376,7 Ohm

PROBABLY BIGGEST Max AND MINIMAL Min LIMITS
M_{pl}
c^{2} = Eplanck
Eplanck
/ h = 7,4008 x10^{42} Hz 

c / hbar
=ωmax
→ ω / 2π
=
fmax
= 0,452444 x10^{42} Hz
→
h fmax
= Ec 
M_{pl}
=√(hc /G)
= 5,456246 x10^{8}
kg
f_{pl}
= 7,4008 x10^{42} Hz
T_{pl}
= 0,13512 x10^{42} sec
E_{pl}
= 49,038293 x10^{8} J
E_{min}
= h 1Hz = 6,62606 x10^{34}
M_{min}
= h 1Hz/c^{2} = 0,73725 x10^{50}
kg
λ_{pl}
= c / fpl = 0,405080 x10^{34}
m
a_{pl}
= f_{pl}^{2}
λ_{pl}
= c^{2} /λ_{pl}
= 22,186977 x10^{50} m/s^{2} 

M_{c} = 0,3335641 x10^{8}
kg = M_{pl}
/ 16,3574
f_{c}
= 0,452444 x10^{42} Hz
T_{c} = 2,210218 x10^{42}
sec
E_{c} = 2,997924 x10^{8}
(kg m^{2} /s ?)
M_{min} = M_{c}/f_{c}
= 0,73725 x10^{50} kg/Hz
λ_{c} = λ_{min}
= 6,62606 x10^{34} m
a_{max}
= f_{c}^{2}
λ_{c}
= c^{2} /λ_{pl}
= 1,356391 x10^{50} m/s^{2} 
Mpl
/ Mc
►
This ratio 16,357 and the small relatively disparity between limits in the two cases is
important and instructive for the research, mainly for the following observation: With a small ratio, it do not change extremely the enormous
numbers, the quantities (after the exhibitor almost remains the itself), however they change
subversively the units and the phenomena that we describe.

MORE LIKELY LIMITS Max AND Min
Vmax
= λmin x
fmax = 2,997924
x10^{8} m/s 

fmax
= Vmax /
λmin
= 0,452444 x10^{42} Hz 
fmin
= amin
/ Vmax = 
Tmin
= Vmax /
amax
= 2,210216 x10^{42} sec 
Tmax
= Vmax /
amin
= 
amax
= Vmax^{2} /
λmin=
1,356394 x10^{50} m/s^{2} 
amin
= Vmax / Tmax
= 
λmin
= Vmax x Tmin
= 6,62606 x10^{34} m 
λmax
= Vmax^{2} /
amin
= 
Mmax
= fmax
/ amax
= 0,3335641 x10^{8} kg 
Mmin
= Emin_{
}/
Vmax^{2}
= 0,73725 x10^{50} kg 
Fmax
= Emax /
λmin
= 0,452444 x10^{42} N 

r_{e}
= e^{2} / 4π M_{e} c^{2} εo = 0,28179367 x10^{14} m
L = M V r = n h /2π →L_{e}
= 9,10938 x10^{31} x 2,18768 x10^{6}
x 0,28179367 x10^{14} = 5,6157 x10^{39} kg m^{2} /sec
F_{ηλ}
/ F_{κ} = (h / 2π)
/ L_{e} = E_{e} / Μ V^{2} = 1,8779 x10^{4}
V = 2π r_{e} / T_{e}
= 1,77056 x10^{14} / 0,080932 x10^{19}
= 2,187713 x10^{6} m/s
(2π r_{e} / T_{e} ) / c
= 2π r_{e} / λ_{e} = e^{2} / ε_{ο} h_{bar} c
4π = α = 7,2974 x10^{3} = 1/137,0346
ε_{ο} = e^{2} / 4π
Ee
re
→ re
= e^{2} / 4π E_{e} ε_{ο} → e^{2} = 4π Ee
ε_{ο} re
1Coulomb = 6,241506363 x10^{18}
eV
h = 6,62606
J sec = 4,1356618 x 10^{15 }eV sec (ή eV/Hz)
1eV
= 0,24179893 x10^{15} Hz (times
the h). Energy of 1eV correspond to
frequency
f=241,798 THz
M = E/c^{2}
→ 1ev x (1,602176 x 10^{19} J) /c^{2} = 0,178266 x10^{35}
kg

COSMOLOGICAL THEORY
ABOUT A COMPLETED TIME OR UNIVERSE AND THE RELATIVITY OF ENERGY

