SOME GUIDELINES FOR THE NATURAL EXPLANATION UNDER THE TITLE
"A COMPLETE TIME (OR COMPLETE UNIVERSE) AND RELATIVITY OF ENERGY"
For researchers physicists: Help for whoever interested physicist in order to advances in the completed mathematic formulation of the cosmological theory
©2010 ISBN 978-960-93-2431-1, ©2012 ISBN 978-960-93-4040-3
Attention! They exist translational errors
"They are not the external material things which with the movement, with the approaching, the removal, the union and their segregation, these achieve a balanced total (of things) and the maintenance of natural laws. On the contrary, preexists the completed Total..."
Many years ago (in 80s decade), with the start of long-lasting configuration of my philosophical thoughts about the nature, I used and processed some broad concepts such as are the motion, the time, distance, energy, matter, change, a small in number of broad concepts that were well rooted in the fecund area in physics. However, my particularly bad relation with the mathematics, it limited the effort in observing, interpreting, understanding about the natural phenomena and in the treatment of wordings, without any calculating sizes and application of types. My cosmological theory under the subtitle “Theory about a Complete Time and Relativity of Energy” initially was published in a philosophical book (The Theology of the Science, © 2000 publications "Dodoni", ISBN 960-385-019-5, pages 448) and it was an unified theory about time, space, matter and intellect. This was a philosophical book, which was written in a period of ten years, in order to be answered some questions about the substance of things avoiding infrequent experiences and all previous theories.
Creatively years were followed and with advantage for the inspirer of the cosmological theory. In the time interval after of the first publication, in that the philosophical theory remained unknown and without somebody to understands it (with few fair effort and without bias, here in my small country), a difficult and insistent effort is continued for correction and clarification of theoretical thoughts. Moreover in order to detected some relations, proportions and ideas in this philosophical theory, that they could be mentioned in the known questions of the official physics. Particularly, in the later times (2008-2012) was attempted a daily investigation to detect of some relations and ideas in the philosophical theory - for a complete Universe with dynamic free space -, which they could be denoted with the known types of the physics. Quickly were found the first relations and observations for its mathematic conjunction, unexpectedly easy. I was forced - I would say - in this search for mathematic relations and in the utilization of known types of physics: in order to I help for the comprehension about this cosmological theory and in order to I cause a physicist to initiates the own effort for a completed mathematic expression. But mainly, I was forced in order to appreciated the consequence and the productive possibility in the worded thoughts, that are constitutes an advanced physical explanation, with the most usual vocabulary, with the vocabulary that we refer in our daily experience!
The mathematic investigation would not had begun and could not advance, if they were not in advance the instructive thoughts of the previous physical explanation with the broad concepts. Some directive thoughts and first conclusions, as about:
the limits in the distance and time,
the close relation between the global or curved space and the limits in time and length,
the close relation between mass with the change in the dynamic energy of the free space,
the close relation of matter with the very fast and circular change in a common substance,
the close relation of gravity with the dynamic energy of the free space,
the close relation between matter with the fluctuation in the energy of free space,
the relative/indirect start of the Universe by the structural elements (that it contains, ie the matter),
for the reduction in energy and in a maximum speed with the presence of matter,
the close elation between the law of the conservation of energy with the stability of the Complete Universe, also with the discontinuity and with the tendency of reintroduction in the balance
and a lot of other enterprising philosophical conclusions.
In philosophical book "The Theology of Science" are exist all the above observations with reasonable thoughts and as reasonable conclusions through the general postulate: " The Universe (as a total of all material things) is always self-existent and itself in the limits of a biggest total time (within a maximum period Tuni in other words). The Universe per Maximum Time Period is always this itself. In the contrary than the parts, which are always incomplete and all things are become and change permanently, without exception… ".
Summarizing, I want to repeat and stress, that the theory for a "Complete Time and Universe" imports in general and theoretically the limits in the time and length and a necessary relation for a connection and coexistence between a minimal limit with a biggest limit. Also inserts a relation for maintaining of limits, despite the change of the sizes. In the physics, these limits are determined at least in the quantity or size of mass, energy, length, time, frequency and in the gravitational force.
A physicist and writer of popular science, Gills Cohen-Tannoudji, in his book “Les constantes universelles” that were published in 1993, he observed without us says nothing more about the precious information that are hidden in the natural constants: “The new interpretation about the constant of world attraction, when it is combined with constants h and c, opens astonishing prospects: the existence of time and length Planck implies that itself space-time it has also quantum structure. Imagine what astonishing consequences that will have the existence of a limit in the division of space, but mainly in the division of time! ” (p123)
The limit in the division of time is the amazing conclusion that results when we consider the (full) Universe as constant (and simultaneous) in the same limits of a total time. And so as this amazing conclusion can results somehow easily, with little imagination and beginning with a simple supposition, so easily with this conclusion result a lot of other conclusions and consequences without experiments, costless and without loss of time! This observation about the limit in the division of time - that is resulted as a conclusion and not accidentally- and the effort for export of all theoretical consequences, they have become early (1990) and this philosophical theory that was developed, it was named somehow contradictorily “Theory about a Complete Time and Relativity of Energy”. In more briefly and comprehensibly, we can call it also “Theory about a Simultaneous and full Universe”.
“ The worldwide moment is not constituted by endless or infinite number of smaller moments, otherwise the Universe would not always be itself in the limits of one (utmost wide) moment. The limits of the sub-moments should not be smaller than a certain minimal limit (otherwise the sub-moments would be infinite in number)”. p153
“ Knowing that the time is the things with their changes (inextricably) and that the Universe exists complete as if has finished inside limits of a wider moment, we find the existence of a maximal and a minimal duration in the interaction… The way by which the common substance (or the Universe) becomes always in its minimal moment, this constant way in the empiric physics, they call matter or mass ”. p164
The climax of this terrible observation about the limits in the division in the time (through general principles in a philosophical book) is the relation of the matter (structural elements) with the minimal time, in which the Universe does begin to become (permanently) by the free space. Therefore, the theory of a Completed Time and the philosophical thought with the abstract significations cannot be passed unnoticed and contemptuously, when the famous and successful scientists make suspicions about a limit in the division of time and about a curious role for world natural constants, yet. Particularly now, after they have been found the first relations and observations, which can expressed with types and mathematic relations. They will be exposed, those who are in a hurry denominate the concepts about "a Complete Universe in the limits of a maximum time" and about a "limit in the division of time" they are accidental philosophical thoughts. Underlined, the intimate signification of the word "time" is a signification decisive for the science of physics and is connected with all sizes and natural forces.
The theory about a complete and stable Universe does not lead the research away of our experience and earthly world. On the contrary, it gives prospect in the human logic, because it does not transfer the problem about the creation of world in something previous or wholly different and we can search the marks in the phenomena around us, that they strengthen this opinion. The marks and the observations strengthen the opinion about an Universe with limits in the changes, an Universe that does not develop unlimitedly in the time, which is not extended infinitely in a flat space, which does not contain infinity quantity of energy and this Universe in its entirety of a maximum period is always this same and participates permanently for the maintenance and the timing of its smaller material elements. OR does the marks strengthen the view about an Universe infinity in the time and in the space, which permanently does develop and becomes different in the passage of time, an Universe that contains an infinity number of things, in infinite distances and in general with infinite quantities? The experience and the science can give the answer also in the two cases, even if the theoretical thought of one person is unable. We don't avoid, therefore, the thoughts that don't thank us or we don't understand well, and we fling some flippant words such as " empty theory ", " philosophy " and " inanity ", expecting that with these phrases we will disarm the reliability and the force of logic. Too, do not repeat like parrots, the theories and ideas that are formulated with mathematics at a part, but they leave enormous voids in knowledge and cause more queries than answers.
The limit in the division of time is one of the more important conclusions in the philosophical theory about a Complete Time and Universe. The astonishing consequences of this limit rather, has not been sought successfully and surely has not become known in all the consequences, neither has been comprehended of no one up to now. In the physics have been observed many phenomena and relations that make way for a better comprehension of the structure in the Universe and matter, and they have approach near to the solution for the conundrum. However, the knowledge has resulted with some accidental observations and with imagination of a few leading scientists in their effort to explain the paradoxical phenomena, which have observed and cause doubts for their scientific conquests. When, however, the knowledge is fragmentary and confused with a multitude of details and only a little number of creative thinking physicists attempt to explain the observations, then many important relations that have the observed phenomena between them are ignored and misplaced.
The first contact of the philosophical interpretation with the mathematic logic is the import of the minimal and biggest limits and the addition of indicator min and max respectively in the symbols of many sizes. The most decisive observation and consequence in the physical interpretation about a complete and stabilised Universe, in general is the existence of periodical phenomena, common attributes and same laws in the all nature, after the all things are considered as most rapid oscillations with a constant quantity of energy (that is to say free space). The periodical phenomena would be impossible and accidentally in the nature, if the motion and change in the nature were not regulated by steady minimal and maximum limits (that are synopsized with constants h,c,G, unconsciously).
In order to we understand without we resort to allegorical and incomprehensible expressions:
• what happen in the structure of matter,
• how behave the microscopic materials in the sub atomic space
• how is connected the motion of microscopic materials with the motion of bigger things
• why the gravitational attraction does not assemble the total of matter (without gap)
It should we recognize that the matter in microscopic level is not a substance, neither some distinguished thing. The matter like smaller elements in the things is not, it becomes and becomes permanently. “ The so-called matter cannot be divided endless or without it ceases the same quality, and this is explained because the matter is not substance, but some way of existence in the common substance. Otherwise, the matter could be not divided or it would be supposed is divided endless, without change the substance ” as I had written. (p158-159).
Consequently we wonder and trying to understand: By what do the matter becomes? Where do becomes permanently? Does the matter is connected with something and becomes endless? And what does it forces to changes in structure of matter with circular and repeated motions? “Chopping” the matter, we do not chop compact and immutable quantities. We chop quantities of motion and micro-quantities that are in interaction. In more microscopic space we reach in the beginning of these microscopic motions and in minimal quantities and finally in their “connection” with an other reality, which concerning these motions, and it is constant and motionless. With a such constant and motionless (relatively) reality become and exist these microscopic motions.
The motion in the interior of microscopic matter and stability in its structure cannot be explained by the energy and the motion of the outer (and accidentally) things or actions. Therefore, the energy with that the structure of matter is maintained, is not drawn outside of the matter and we know well, that the matter exists in enormous distances of space and over time. This observation alone leads to the conclusion that the matter, nearby or away, is connected with something common, with a common reality and even so, that the matter exists with the same microscopic structure. This shared reality is nothing else than the " free " space. How could it maintain itself the structure of an atom and be repeated the same structure in endless quantity of matter, if the changes in the interior of the atom were only exterior movements, such as those (mechanical motions) where we observe in to free space? If we think more carefully we will perceive, that even if we only had a Newtonian view for the world, then only a God could regulate, synchronize and maintain the microscopic motions, so that they constitute fundamental quantities of length and time for the bigger things! If the God of Leibnitz's philosophy is not a satisfactory explanation for us, then with childish thinking we can see, that something is happening in most microscopic dimensions for all matter everywhere in the Universe and it is not an exterior connection of some particles. That something, with the knowledge that we have for the phenomenon of motion, from all experiences up today, cannot be something else than a wave change in an invisible carrier of energy, that we perceive such as free space. Only in the wave change (and fluctuation in energy) we can observe a huge number of mathematic relations, rhythmic and regularly phenomena in order to interpreted a multitude of particular phenomena, that we observe indirectly in the most microscopic dimensions of nature.
What differentiates spectacularly the microscopic world is the motion and creation, that become with wave way and wave phenomena. Therefore a smaller thing meets the gigantic world not only externally... That is to say, it is not connected only with the exterior and separate parts of nature, only with the obvious phenomena such as the moving, the collision and inertia. All things, independent of their geometric dimensions are connected with a common quantity of energy in smaller lengths and permanently (with faster rhythms). All things are considered as shaping by most rapid oscillations of energy in a constant quantity, that is found in balanced situation. For this reason, the mathematical relations and the types that are essential for description of big material bodies (as some that have synopsized with constants h,c,G), these same relations are essential for the calculations in microscopic dimensions. Because the minimal limits in the energy alterations coexisting with maximal limits and they are conserved, along with an average, near in that the fluctuations constitute the structural elements. Because the minimal limits in energy alterations coexisting with maximal limits and thus are preserved, along with the averaging (nearly) in that are fluctuate the motions that constitute the structural elements. The research in smaller dimensions is a research about the limits of the Universe.
With a reasonable analysis in certain broad concepts and with the help of fantastic representation, we can observe certain constant phenomena and general relations, that are found in the microscopic space in matter. Of course, in order to we draw information about microscopic space, they needed tools with the advanced technology, which could be manufactured for first time during in the 20th century. It is supposed, that we are informed and possess the elementary knowledge that it needs for the comprehension of treatise and mainly in order to do not considered as ignorance our initial report in the matter with general terms and without the precious scientific knowledge. We would not dare to talk about the structure of matter with theoretical thoughts and logical analyses, if the general concepts had not been shaped previously and with observations on the common experience :
1) An aspect about one self-existent and complete Universe (in a biggest time period).
2) An aspect about the close relation of a such Complete Universe with the presence of empty (free) space,
3) and with the limits in the time and length (hence also with limits in the motion).
4) About the relation of the above theoretical observations with the curvature of free space (limit of longest distance and possibility of removal and approach simultaneously) and
5) with the presence of matter in role of carrier and as initial wave change for the existence of more complex (or indirect) material things.
6) About the close relation between the particles with the phenomena of periodical change and with the known wave phenomena.
These are the fundamental (initial and
directive) theoretical thoughts that constitute the core in the rational cosmological theory, that brings the paradoxical title " Theory about a
Complete Time and Relativity of Energy ".
In the field of physics and chemistry, the behavior of matter and the attributes concerning its structure are described and explained with the all details. Here, we talk more in general and we were reported in a common phenomenon, where we observe in the all particular cases. This common phenomenon is the motion and the transfer of energy with a shift (movement) or with wave way.
Attention! They exist translational errors
A main theoretical discrimination should it becomes in the physics. The presence of the Universe becomes with two forms of motion, that are not described with the same terminology and are not expressed by the same laws. With the first aspect, the Universe, the motion and the transfer of energy become in to space with the material things, so as each person was perceive always, also thus as described in the “mechanistic” physics and in chemistry. In the other side, it exists the “ immobility " of a finite space (like a stabilized quantity of dynamic energy), where each change causes some inhibited motion, motion with tendency for reintroduction in the situation of immobility (or in quiet) of the free space and this is the wave motion. The wave motion does not " obey " in the Newtonian logic about the motion, because this motion is generated with the resistance that is presented in the change and not in the lack of resistance.
This theoretical segregation of the motion is useful for the comprehension and the explanation of many phenomena. The material carriers (the particles) with their internal energy are not broken away from the free space neither simply are finds in to space. The microscopic structure of the matter testify the wave motion of the free space and the relation between the free space with the phenomenon of inertia and creation of particles ( Mmax = fmax h /c2 ), also as with the electromagnetic phenomena.
This discrimination of the “motion” and the comprehension about the relation between space and matter lead us also to the natural explanation for gravitational attraction and to the clarification about paradoxical terms, as “deformity or curved space-time”, “alteration of geometry space-time” and “gravitational force”. Like a chain reaction, the explanation about the phenomenon of gravitational attraction and its relation with the mass reveals the close connection that they have them the electromagnetic phenomena, the nuclear energy together and how is created the matter. Still, our view about the dark space as a finite quantity of energy that is presented in the points of decrease or change as some particles, helps in order to we describe the (wave) behavior of free space and its relation with the located matter, with terms of the classic physics and without “ we devise ” new phenomena.
The description for “erotic” relation between the space and matter is needs to becomes with particular care. The free space should not be considered as an absolute immobility neither as a chaotic motion. The presence of the free space is relative, with double role and the characteristic “ a carrier of the energy ” that we attribute in this, it needs to clarified in order to we understand, how it can exists some energy with this unnoticed bodiless way. Really, it did not exist beyond suspicion and more invisible existence than the free space. The explanation for this phenomenon about the existence of free space and extent will reveal with undeniable scientific way, something worse than a hidebound mathematic approach for the nature in the traditional physics. It will reveals to us the unjustifiable errors and the omissions of world scientific community on a lot of decades (for example, by flippant criteria rejection of the “ ether ” and a common system of report for the motion and time, while the report becomes with the constant speed of c). The ignorance about the way that is presented the light, caused misinterpretation of its relation with the material things and it was considered as a motion in the space, so as is the motion of material bodies. While the light is a wave motion of the same free space… and fluctuation of existing energy (according to the relations h = Emax / fmax = Emin / fmin and Εmax / Emin = Tmax / Tmin and P = h fmin/Tmin = h fmax/Tmax ). Moreover, in the known physics they left in the dark the easy observation about the maintenance of matter with internal processes, where become same, with the same laws in the all extent in free space and they are connected with wave (electromagnetic) phenomena, so as are the light and heat. Thus, it remained in the dark the permanent relation that exists between the phenomenon of visible mass and the invisible wave changes, that at a part includes the electromagnetic phenomena.
In the microcosm, the mass is results with motion and its structure is maintained with periodical and synchronous motions and with wave phenomena, that are known. In the structure of the matter does not exist this possibility is separated the thing of its motion, because there in the “depth”, the thing is created with some rapid motion and does not exist as a separate and independent thing. When, therefore, we speak about the source of mass and microscopic structure of matter, it should we thought instantly, that the speed and the energy of moved quantities are not some distinguished attributes of certain compact microscopic bodies. The microscopic quantities of matter are relative situations of immobility, accumulation and exchange of energy, because are created by very fast rythm in the motion, also wave phenomena that the concealed presence of the free space “encourages”. And the forces that are presented and maintained in the microscopic structure of matter, they are not emanated from the microscopic movement of some minimal masses neither from certain exterior source. They are created by the attribute of the constant space to assembles and decentralizes its energy with highest frequency and by phenomena of co-ordination, that increase the accumulation or the decrease of the energy.
► Basically, a wave in the isotropic energy of free space can be decentralized (expansion) or be focused (contraction) actinic. By this way the wave energy reduced circularly removed or on the contrary, is strengthened when it focus. In the first case belongs the electromagnetic radiation while in second case belongs the gravitational radiation. The observation for the gravity as a phenomenon by wave motion in opposite direction, can be proved decisive importance for the investigation about the maintenance of the structure of the matter.
► Around us, eventuate exchanges of energy and also interactions with the matter in frequencies above 1020 Hz, in microscopic dimensions and with the speed of the light. Up to now, this reality we didn't calculate it, we simplified it with the concept of the "free space" and we perceived flippant its presence like the electromagnetic phenomena and gravity. An invisible reality participates permanently in the material developments with sums of energy, that are exchanged and altered between 1020 - 1042 Hz and this reality they ignored in the science. This reality participates permanently and simultaneously for entire the material world, from the one point up to the utmost other… In the physics, the sums of energy, that are exchanged and altered in the very soon time intervals (t=1/f), they called them " particles ".
Do you speak still, about the total creation of the Universe also about the fantasy of Big Bang? At a maximum speed of c the mass becomes infinite or variations of free space, which when they decelerated then caused electromagnetic waves and after more slowdown created particles with mass?
The cosmological theory, that finally we can name it under representative title "Theory about a Complete Time or Universe and Relativity of Energy", is in diametrical opposition with the sovereign opinion of “Big Bang theory”, which dominated and was promoted for a lot of decades. This cosmological theory begins with the simple thought about a self-existent and stabilized Universe, but with this (determinant) divergence: The universe is stable in the limits of a biggest time interval. The Universe (in its entirety) did not begin with some Big Explosion (Big Bang), but on the contrary existed and it maintains always the itself with the dynamic presence of matter, where interacts permanently with the free but finite space! The main concept in the theory about a full Universe is contrary to the widespread and more recognized cosmological theory of last decades and comparably to each theory, that is reported in a previous creation of the Universe. This theory began without the discoveries of the physics* or recourses to previous theories. However accomplishes to describes and explains unified a lot of relations between many different phenomena, such as are the free space, the time and rhythm, the motion, the matter, the energy, the inertia and furthermore, with unprecedented logic explains the appearance of the Life. It explains the biological phenomena like an expression (externalization) in the direct and simultaneous presence of the Common Total, via the most abstract reality, which are the material carriers in the microscopic dimensions in step (sync) with complete Universe (that is exists such as a free space with fluctuations in its balanced energy). Really, it is a theory with big expectations, that was expounded with usual vocabulary and through general beginnings (that are called philosophical analyses) and it succeed to enters creatively in scientific questions, which are presented in the physics through accidental observations and discoveries. Moreover, this theory goes a step more beyond and utilizes the physics, without to conflict, of course.
► The serious, logically and intelligent questions that it should they place...
Attention! Exist translational errors
* FOOTNOTE: A multitude of accidental and fragmentary ascertainments in our experience and a multitude of separate explanations can result more fast, more easily and not accidentally. They can through the theoretical analysis of meanings, with the correlation of few general concepts and with our possibility we know the all things through the observation for relations and resemblances in the nearest and the most usual things in our experience.
I have developed in big number of pages the subject, how the human thought functions also is capable to know easily and rightly, in a multitude of cases and without the use of mathematics. In certain cases, we know with 100% certainty and we observe relations, that we cannot formulate with mathematic relations or do not need the mathematics in order to we make sure itself. In a multitude of cases, even in our daily life. When a multitude of phenomena are connected from each other and interpreted as single, when the all pieces do suit and unknown aspects are revealed and new relations that were absent to us in order to we understand well, then easily we can check if the " parcel " is an accidental combination or it is thus imposed in order to we do not led in impasses and impossible experiences.
We distinguish if we saw a dream or if we were awake and perceive it immediately, only and only because we perceive a multitude of things and their relations, which they appear constitutes an united total. Because the information that comes from the different our sensory organs " they tie up " the things from each other (with not accidental relations) and " they do not tie up " with our separate dreams. I do not want here to develop more the question, after I have wrote already about this question and it is a question well known. Simply I want to say, do not us seen strange by no means, how can somebody thinks effectively and gives answers and explanations about phenomena, which arbitrarily we believe that they can not answered without mathematic and without an assessed scientific knowledge.