h = 6,62606 x
10-34 kg m2 / sec
Relativity of time or energy?
- The big traps of experience - the small explosions of indivisible
THE BIG EXPLOSION IN THE SPACE OF SCIENCE
THAT WILL UPSET THE PHYSICS AND THE
PHILOSOPHY AND IT WILL CHANGE IN THE NEXT DECADES THE OPINION OF MAN ABOUT THE LIFE AND THE WORLD !
Like the balance and stability
would not have a meaning without the motion and change, also the
conservation of energy would not have a
meaning without the decrease of energy (...) The natural laws, which
regulate the existence and the structure of material elements are not messages that come from
outside, from far and insubstantial way. These laws begin from the common " contact " that the all structural elements
have with one and the same " empty " space, with one and common completed
reality, with the same " communal " quantity of energy, finally from the common (invisible) their
substance. The total quantity of energy is the same for the all things and
the all structural elements takes shape with the same fluctuations of energy
in one and same dynamic space.
The first publication in the world
QUESTIONS - SHORT ANSWERS !
logic transcended the limits of fantasy !
The revelation about
the role of matter for the complex things and the instructive
observations for the research begins in the moment, where we will
think about an Universe complete within interval of a Maximum
Period. With theoretical observations and with a sequence of reasoning, we can
think more details and observe:
1) The finite space corresponds in the
complete universe which is not present (in relative to the material world).
2) The free space is with a limit of
longest distance (of removal), same for the all things (= a finite non-Euclidean geometry space).
3) The limit in the increase of the
length and in the longest distance (of removal) signals a limit of a minimal curvature. Respectively, the limit of a minimal length signals a limit
for the increased curvature.
4) The finite space offers simultaneously
two limits: in the removal and the approach.
5) The distance in the free space is also
distance in the time (because inevitably, the distance takes a time to travel).
6) The limit in the increase of length,
given that a superior speed exists in the motion, is also a limit in the maximum time of an interaction. The limit of minimal length also signals a
limit for the minimal time of the interaction.
7) The empty (free) space is connected
dynamically also with mathematic relations with the structural elements, because the free space identified with a constant quantity of energy, while
the structural elements with fluctuations of this constant energy.
8) The relation of finite space with the
structure of matter is direct, simultaneous for the total of matter and its behavior is wave. It exists a permanent relation between the visible
mass with the invisible wave changes, and at a part these wave phenomena include the known electromagnetic phenomena.
9) The isotropic relation of free space
with the material things, after does not exist an absolute beginning and termination in its finite length.
10) The energy of free space is found in
balanced situation and when is disturbed, then this balance can comes back in the minimal time. (After of first calculations: minimal inertia Mmin =
0,737248 x10-50 kg·s).
11) A fluctuation of energy is caused
when the energy is transmitted (wave and oscillation).
12) The tendency of space to transmit
energy in order to it compensates (counterbalance) the points where the energy is decreased.
13) The presence of the matter and
particles are considered as moments in the change of energy of the free space, and is owed in conditions where the substitution (compensation) in
energy is prevented or becomes belatedly. (The flow impeded and delayed).
14) The structural elements are need also
in the case of the completed Universe, after with the matter are achieved the most fast changes and their synchronism and thus (more indirectly)
achieved combinations of particles and are created the separate things,
15) however, the structural elements not
create of themselves alone the things also the complete Universe
16) and accordingly it should we think,
that the structural elements are not autonomous things neither indivisible or immutable quantities, and are not approach accidentally between them
and only after exterior action.
17) They are periodical changes that
become with the presence of an other common quantity and without that common quantity, they would not existed, or would were accidental quantities
(without chance). The matter, here near or far us, is connected with something public, with a common reality and with such particular way, that the
matter maintains everywhere the same structure.
18) They are not a lot of separate forces
in each one microscopic atom of matter. A common force is applied (or becomes disruption in a common force) anyplace with configuration of matter.
19) The specifications of each atom of
the matter are not accidental and in null base and coincidentally the same specifications everywhere in to Universe and after somebody accidental "
copying " of its atomic structure, in enormous distances of the empty space. The separate atoms of the matter are connected and become permanently
with a common quantity and with the invisible presence of balanced energy.
20) The timing of microscopic particles
and their formation in material things (bodies) up to visible and astronomical world (even for a short time interval) does not achieved accidental
and coincidentally. They exist in advance the limits in the change of motion and for each motion, limit in quantities of energy that are exchanged
(with an unit of time) and exist some constant relations (laws) for the materialization of invisible total energy (of free space, so as appears in
us). The beginning for the microscopic structure of matter and the energy that maintains, it does not emanates externally with transfer of energy in
to space, with motions of some bodies.
The free space
is found in balance
with a maximum frequency of the nature and not simply it is something motionless.
This is a new view in the cosmological theory about a Complete
Universe, that is results with first observations after the
mathematical investigation (in 2008) and of the need :
1) To interprets the very fast alterations in microscopic lengths, which do not begin and synchronize
with the motions of the big bodies, but with their immediate connection with one common quantity,
2) to interprets the maximum speed of the wavy disturbances of the free space (with the speed of the light), because these waves are not appeared to
start at a null speed and as a motion same, such as of visible bodies, and finally
3) in order to correct the meaning of "mass". The creation of structural elements is interpreted as a phenomenon (of combined motions), that it can
be described without the term " body or particle ", without units "kg", but by wavy motions and e/m phenomena.
As we will see, the leading physicists of the
decades that passed they did not make the simplest thoughts and did not place the most
obvious questions, before they place questions about the more complex phenomena and front
they seek solutions in more complicated problems.
The observation for the
limits in the natural changes in general, is one from the many that
it escaped from the physics, leaving intact the scientific doctrine
of non-existence of limits in the nature and downgrading the
enormous experience from observations for periodical phenomena and
despite the knowledge about the universal physical constants.
In order to a constant relation
comes out from a process, the quantities or the sizes should be altered with a limit and from each
other made dependent, at such way in order that, when a quantity is decreased, the other
is increased also on the contrary. When we meet in the nature a constant relation which
belongs in a dynamic phenomenon or in a process of nature, if we are intelligent
researchers, immediately it should we think, that this constant relation is results from
certain changes that somehow balance from each other.
Already from the 20th
century, they have been expressed thoughts and opinions about the
decisive role of the free space in the structure of matter. From the
research, the clues and paradoxical phenomena had multiplied and
certain physicists recognized the impasse of a natural
interpretation about the structure of matter, if we had begin from
separate particles. However, their these advanced thoughts, they
made them with full weakness to interpret the presence of the free
space, transferring again the problem about the creation of matter
in order to is solved in the unknown future, with boat a hope! They
think evaluating the information in
the modern research, without they interpret, even in general, how
itself the free space participates in the shaping for the structure
of matter, how are result its attributes, how the all different
phenomena are produced by changes in certain fundamental relations
like transformations with a common quantity of energy. Their contribution for
the research would be more useful and original, even if they
advanced in the solution of the problem, with the formulation
of questions, leastwise in the case where it was not possible to advance with
the mathematical language.
One of most
important finding for the research is, that the relations where
are presented in the subdivisions of the lengths and angles in
the circle (trigonometrical relations), these same relations
are presented in the all periodical changes. In the microscopic
structure of matter and in the alteration of energy, these
relations are presented so as separate phenomena and
attributes, while they are moments in the periodical change of
energy and relations between quantities. The ratio of geometric
lengths and angles correspond in ratio of sizes and values that
are altered or deviate periodically.
without he is nuclear physicist nor electrician can understands,
how many more important and useful are the geometric relations,
that in the branch of mathematics have recorded, that was
named trigonometry. And when we speak for invisible phenomena
where altered with the faster speed in the microscopic space and
found the nature, even an unintelligent in the mathematics
understands, in what trap have fallen many times over the
better physicists: They record an endless volume with
fragmentary observations for microscopic phenomena and
snapshots of action, without they have conscience for most
close relation that these phenomena have always between them.
The physicists then believed that the stability in the speed of the light does not agree with the
relativity of motions and speeds, if they added. The history of those researches is well known and corny. After measurements with experimental
devices,* a carrier for propagation of the light (ether) - with a response and attributes such as some researchers had imagined - was not detected
and the assumption about an ether was rejected. This was one than bigger errors in the history of physics, because after:
• It founded in thought of physicists in all world and for a lot of decades, the concept about an
absolutely free space.
• The suspicions for the attributes of free space were cleaned and their systematic research was
stopped. They chose to consider the free space like something rubbery.
• The research for the beginning of nature was focused in the structure of matter and was limited in
the search of elementary particles.
• The observation of wave phenomena was downgraded in the research for the structure of matter and it
caused difficulties as an opposite phenomenon, that cannot coexist with the motion of (separated) particles.
• They removed of their theories for the nature every other stable limit, while the things were
considered as phenomena that are dependent only of their exterior conditions, without have a common point. All motions were considered as depended
and allocated only in relation each of other, externally in the free space.
• The speed of the light was identified with speed of bodies and particles.
Famous is the experiment Maikelson-Morley (Michelson-Morley) in the late 19th century
One century later...
I sought to collaborate with a
physicist in order to that completes the mathematic formulation of
dreamed cosmological theory. A lot of persons that communicated with
me imagined a problem formulated clearly with mathematic relations,
ready for solution, so as are the exercises in the school
examinations. If the problem was formulated thus and did not need
more knowledge and thought about natural phenomena, then obviously
innumerable professors would have solved this problem, in older
years. However, the problem was to locate and describes the problem,
the new physical interpretation to comprehended, be appreciated the
new natural phenomena or new relations between the phenomena, you
ascertain the approaching in the solution with certain first
calculations and finally the problem is formulated with all
the pieces, that need for its mathematic solution and for the extension
of physical interpretation.
WHY THE CENTRAL IDEA OF THE "BIG BANG" THEORY, IT IS THE BIGGEST
FOOLISHNESS IN THE SCIENCE ! READ HERE
SHORT ANSWERS - BIG SURPRISES !
κοσμολογία, cosmology, in
German: Kosmologie, in Italian and Portuguese: cosmologia, in France:
cosmologie, in Spanish: cosmología, in Russian: космология, in Chinese: 宇宙论, in
Hindi: ब्रह्मांड विज्ञान (), in Turkish: kozmoloji, in Swedish and Norwegian:
kosmologi, in Arabic: الكوزمولوجيا علم الكونيات , in Hebrew: קוסמולוגיה
φιλοσοφία, philosophy, in German: Philosophie, in Italian and Portuguese:
filosofia, in France: philosophie, in Spanish: filosofía, in Russian: философию,
in Chinese: 哲学, in Hindi: दर्शन (tattvadnyaan), in Turkish: felsefe, in Swedish
and Norwegian: filosofi, in Arabic: الفلسفة , in Hebrew: פילוסופיה
G = 6,6725 x10-11
m3 kg-1 s-2