*

THE COMPLETE COSMOS, THE MATTER & THE WAVE PHENOMENA

*

 

 

 

 

"If I could know in the beginning that I learn now !" a popular Greek saying

star INTRO PAGE

For creatively thinking!

 

 


Gr language  Eng lang

 

 

THE RELATIVITY OF TIME AND ENERGY  ---  THE MICROSCOPIC EXPLOSIONS OF "EMPTY" SPACE 

??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

 

 ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

???

spacer

 

c =2,997924 x108 m/s

 

 

h = 6,62606 x 10-34 kg m2 / sec

 

 

π = 3,14159...

 

 

2π = 6,283185

 

 

c2 =8,98755 x1016

 

 

μο = 4π x 10-7 H/m

 

 

εο=1/36π 109 F/m

 

 

μο/εο =zo =μο c

 

 

c = 1 / √ μο εο

 

 

c2 = 1 / μο εο

 

 

Ε = h f = hc / λ

 

 

Εo = m c2 = F λ

 

 

Fη = k q1 q2 / r2  

 

 

c=120π /4π x10-7  

 

 

zo=120π   

 

 

c / h =fmax  

 

 

 c = fmax λmin

 

 

 c = amax tmin

 

 

c = zo / μ

 

 

 fmax=Vmax /λmin

 

 

Fmax=Emax /λmin

 

 

  λmin = c2 /amax

 

 

  amax = c2 / λmin

 

 

amax=λmin fmax2

 

 

Emax=Fmax λmin

 

 

 Emax = fmax h

 

 

Henry Farad =sec2

 

 

e=1,602176 x10-19

 

 

√2 = 1,4142135

 

 

0,452444 x1042

 

 

1,35639 x1050 

 

 

12,3559 x1019

 

 

2,26873 x1023

 

 

.h / c λmin = Mmax

 

 

.Vmax = Mmax V / M

 

 

 

h c  / λ = Mpl G / λ

 

 

 

 

λe / re 2π = c / Vκ

 

 

 

 

1rad / s ~ 0,1591 Hz

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

Relativity of time or energy? - The big traps of experience - the small explosions of indivisible space…

LET'S TALK WITH FRANKNESS AND WITH OUR OWN THINKING

 
 

 

THE BASIS FOR THE EFFECTIVE AND RATIONAL THOUGHTS

ABOUT THE DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION OF THINGS:
THE TWO OPPOSITE PROSPECTS FOR THE RESEARCH OF NATURE

 

SELECT: 

Are we living in a disruptive (incoherent) world, without no one limit, with things that become until each one to differs of other, without have any common trait, in a world that has infinite possibilities to happen everything, with things that are connected each one from other utterly coincidentally and occasionally with an accidental assemblage? Do we living in a chaotic world, where all things change but the stability and laws are something accidental and a casual phenomenon, with the exterior meeting of many parts and moreover by microscopic molecules? The possibility of approaching does is an accidental phenomenon, also?

OR

Are we living in one world, that has certain decisive limits and con­sists of things, that are always connected with one and the same reality, such as parts in one and the same total, in an united world where is regulated by laws and thus the infinite variety of things begins with the specifications by a common total, without destroyed the eternal balance? Do we live in a chaotic world, where the stability is something accidental or the things change in a way (periodically, circular, repetitive…) so as to exist the phe­nomena of timing, balance and finally the prospect for things with a constant structure and existence, and not a chaos of contradictory molecules between them? Do we will hide the interpretation about the cosmos in some words, so as when we utter the word " form ", that presents the existence of a thing so easy and static? Or do we will observe, that the form in a thing is a tangly implementation, that becomes with dynamic processes, for that only one natu­ral and reasonable explanation can we give?

 

Think simply also with your own crisis: The formulation of above dilemma with few simple words shows clearly only two opposite prospects for the human research and for meaning of the life. It will be proved, therefore, that a lot of phenomena which we believed that they are difficult to explained, these phenomena were much more easily and that on the contrary, in the science have been conquered the solutions in much difficult questions. Also, it will be proved that until now, the reasons for which the research not reveals many answers in the diachronic queries was certain biases, that prevented the research, it was the incredible paranoia of the human that influences overall of his behavior and it was the excessive focus of human thought on the survival and in some relations of person with other humans. The big dimensions of the natural world, that is to say the illimitable limits of length and time, serve the variety of phenomena and the complicated shaping of the things. Nothing other!

It is not only an unforeseen answer in world queries about the creation of the world. It's not only the fact, that certain new discoveries throw light in dark philosophical and scientific questions, which remained unanswered on centuries and in particularly questions of modern physics on many decades. The most unforeseen and astonishing is that the answers are given unified for a multitude of phenomena, through a minimum and generic thoughts, which are formulated with the usual vocabulary in some hundreds of pages, only. With theoretical observations and analyses of the most general concepts, so as the ancient philosophers could approach. While, everyone imagined and expected some volumes with the difficult mathematics and the data processing of a computer!

The physical interpretation about the structure of the Universe and matter does not only include a lot of solutions about theoretical problems and answers for curious men. Its consequences are not limited in the inquiring region of physics and astronomy. It will causes more agitation in the questions about the human logic and thought. Particularly for the capabilities and weaknesses of a specialized intellect, questions about the educational system, about the leading role of the thought and information in the daily life, about the observation in the thought and imagination, about the unanticipated contribution of chance, ignorance, even of errors in the thought also in the life, for the human possibility to makes the deceit a science and finally, for the destination of a life without thought or with thought focused in perceivable things. Also, the life will revealed in more close relation with intellect and the intellect as a trait of the universe entire inside a maximum time interval. 

 

 

Do you know, believe or speculate ?

" The knowledge which has our consent and is acceptable because of insecurity, in order to we do not appeared illiterates, fools or uninformed or for certain other expediency, it is not our reliable knowledge. It is our faith, it is hasty certainty or a bet with a lot of probabilities, however no knowledge that differs than the religious faith ".

                                                               Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis

 

 

 

 

ISBN 978-960-93-4040-3

THE COMPLETE UNIVERSE AND DYNAMICAL FREE SPACE

 

Make a choice :

Do we will choose an interpretation about the nature with  unknown, rare, unique and fantastic phenomena (for example, flavor of quark)? Or do we will choose an interpretation that begins from the most known, the most frequent and common phe­nomena (for example, speed of the motion and rhythm of fluctuation)? 

 

 

magnetic field

 

 

THE ANSWERS ARE OFFERED TO THE SCIENCE AND RESEARCH WITH WORKADAY LANGUAGE, THAT ALL PEOPLE CAN TO UNDERSTAND IT AND WITH FIRST MATHEMATICAL RELATIONS, IN WHICH A STUDENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION IS CAPABLE TO VALIDATE THEM AND UTILIZE. 

THE KNOWLEDGE, THE MONEY, THE TECHNICAL TOOLS, THE RE­SEARCHERS WERE NOT ABSENT. HOWEVER IT WAS ABSENT, SOMETHING ELSE MOST ESSENTIAL AND IMPORTANT… IT WAS APPRECIATED FROM THE AUTHOR OF THE COSMOLOGICAL THEORY (WHERE IT IS SUMMARIZED BELOW), IN ORDER TO IS PROVED THROUGH THE NATURE ITSELF, HOW IMPORTANT IT IS THIS... THAT WAS ABSENT.

printed books digital books cd-rom

The advanced physical interpretation for the struc­ture of the Universe and matter, with all those pieces of thought that facilitate exclusively the comprehension of the cosmological theory and giving answers, with the ef­fective succession (thread) in the queries that are creat­ed, it has for­mulated in three books and not in the web pages. In the (digital and printed) books are observed the universal traits and the fundamental relations of all individual things, starting from a few most general concepts. The natural phe­nomena are de­scribed uni­fied and concisely, necessarily from the beginning with the most universal concepts, so as no one up to today have made it. With the logical method of abduction inference (abductive reasoning) and with generative thought (deductive reasoning) are revealed all the particular relations between of phenomena, about which we know from the opposite direction of inductive method, even about phenomena difficult to observed or more complicated. Many differ­ent and unexplained phenomena are reduced to a minimum num­ber and of most obvious phenomena, and thus are explained. More­over, the particular things with all their details are appeared as results of few phenomena of motion and quantitative relations. It is stressed, that in the Inter­net and from pages with segmental thoughts IS NOT presented exclusively, completely, with cohesion and without un­necessary thoughts, the natural explanation for the struc­ture of the Universe and matter.

 

 

BIG QUESTIONS - BIG SURPRISES !

mini bang!

WHAT THEY DID NOT THINK AND DID NOT GIVE IMPORTANCE... IN THE PHYSICS AND PHILOSOPHY IN THE LAST CENTURIES 

 

 

An example: Think somebody who works hard, runs many times and makes a lot of attempts in order to achieves what an other person accomplishes rested and more fast. If we wish the result, then we will be not impressed from what appears more active and more durable. Example 2nd: Think someone employee that brings many customers and money in your shop, while sits for a long hours· now think an other employee, that runs and tries hardly, but the cash machine is empty. Whom do would select? Now, apply the same thought for the scientific research: What the meaning, someone to solves difficult equations, describes impressively to us the phenomena and who is capable in the application of scientific methods, if in order to we understand him, it will need to we study for a lot of years and while an other researcher finds, the same results and avoids the impasses with the language that understands each student of medium education!

 

♪♪♫

 

1986 - 1998   |   2000 - 2008   |   2008 - 2012

COSMOLOGICAL THEORY ABOUT A COMPLETE AND STABLE UNIVERSE

 

 

WHY THE CENTRAL IDEA IN THE "BIG BANG" THEORY, IT IS THE BIGGEST FOOLISHNESS IN THE SCIENCE !  READ HERE

 

ENTRY FOR PHYSICISTS

Interpretation & Math investigation

 

 

back next

SHORT ANSWERS - BIG SURPRISES !

 

ATTENTION !

THEIR PROBLEMS WANT TO BECOME ALSO OUR OWN PROBLEMS

THEY WANT TO HANDLE OUR LIFE IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE IN THEIR AIMS

κοσμολογία, cosmology, in German: Kosmologie, in Italian and Portuguese: cosmologia, in France: cosmologie, in Spanish: cosmología, in Russian: космология, in Chinese: 宇宙论, in Hindi: ब्रह्मांड विज्ञान (), in Turkish: kozmoloji, in Swedish and Norwegian: kosmologi, in Arabic: الكوزمولوجيا علم الكونيات , in Hebrew: קוסמולוגיה

φιλοσοφία, philosophy, in German: Philosophie, in Italian and Portuguese: filosofia, in France: philosophie, in Spanish: filosofía, in Russian: философию, in Chinese: 哲学, in Hindi: दर्शन (tattvadnyaan), in Turkish: felsefe, in Swedish and Norwegian: filosofi, in Arabic: الفلسفة , in Hebrew: פילוסופיה

 on 2017-05-26.

 

spacer

 

G = 6,6725 x10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

 

 

M=E/c2 = h / f λ2

 

 

   M = h f μο εο

 

 

V = S / t

 

 

  p = M V = E / V

 

 

aκ = V2 / r

 

 

S = 1/2 a t2

 

 

g = G M / r2

 

 

F = M a

 

 

   a = V2 /λ = λ f2

 

 

V =GM / r

 

 

Fg = G M1 M2 / r2

 

 

G=c2 / Smax

 

 

zo=50G /μο

 

 

Mmax=Fmax / amin

 

 

c2 / λmin = Gmax

 

 

   c2 = amax λmin  

 

 

   ω = 2 π f = V/ r

 

 

  2π = T Vκ / r 

 

 

  f =ω / 2π =V/2π r

 

 

λmax=amin Tmax2

 

 

 λmax = c2 /amin   

 

 

  amin = c / Tmax

 

 

   amax = c / Tmin

 

 

  c = h / M λ  

 

 

  M=m c / √c2- V2

 

 

L = M V r

 

 

0,73725 x10-50

 

 

cos 90° = 0

 

 

c  G = 0,02

 

 

0,44929 x1019  

 

 

9,10938 x10-31   

 

 

1,67262 x10-27 

 

 

.Mpl2 =h c / G

 

 

.F r2 = M1M2 G

 

 

 

G = Fλ2 / Mpl2

 

 

 

 

DH / 1Mpc = c / VH

 

 

 

 

parsec~3,086x1016 m

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

   

© Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis

Edit & Design 2004 - 2014  |  All rights reserved

Best view at 1024x768px | screen 17"minimum | IE v.6.0 +