*

THE COMPLETE COSMOS & THE MATTER  /  THE SELF-REGULATING UNIVERSE & THE LIFE

Thoughts from a new start and about a beginning... Earth

***                                                                              comet

* HOME |     | ABOUT |     | FIND THE EXIT! |     | COSMOS & LIFE |     | COSMOLOGY

*

KNOWLEDGE &THINKING     |      MAN & SOCIETY     |     THE BOOKS     |      PHILOSOPHERS

?

DECEPTION

 

 

For creatively thinking!


 

Attention! Exist translational errors.
Please, help in the translation from Greek to English language!

 

OBSERVATIONS OF PHYSICS THAT ARE FORECASTED WITH PHILOSOPHICAL THOUGHTS

 

fngr What was the motile thought that prompted a young man to attempts for many years, to writes about the total of things with the most abstract words and he seeks to explains a multitude of different phenomena with a few concepts and not in report at the concrete things? What have not observe a lot of educated per­sons and scientists in the human intellect, that it offers to us the possibility to we de­scribe the things with usual vocabulary and overall the things, to we think creatively and with imagination, but also of finding so much relations between the signifi­cances, with logical outcome (reasonable consequence), so that we be drifted away and develop a dark philosophical theory.

 

© 2000 ISBN 960-385-019-5

[-]

They have passed many years since the initial publication of physical interpretation under the title Theory of the Completed Time and the Relativity of Energy. In this time interval, that the theory about the Completed Time and Universe remained unknown and without somebody finds to comprehend it, with few fair effort and without bias, it became big effort for correction and clarification. Moreover, became investigation for mathematic formulation from a bad student of mathematics, in order to helps an interested and lucky physicist to advances in the completed mathematic formulation of the theory. Other ten years was lost for the Science and the History, however creatively and with advantage for the author of the theory. Henceforth, everyone who is reported in the cosmological and philosophical questions in order to investigates or informs, without first he has know and comprehend the Theory about the Complete Universe, he will ignores the reality and will is belated, literally.

Imagine the case of a person who is fugitive (from justice), who moved between us, without no one recognizes him and hears, what are said about his chance or he acted. Imagine the thoughts, the scripts, the affairs, the analyses, that he will hears about his life and acts, from accidental interlocutors, from the journalists, from his persecutors, from the experienced analysts of particular facts. Surely, he will hears many talks, that will cause him laughter. Particularly, when the information come from the most experienced analysts publicly, from the radio-television media and from the responsible persons, who handle and solve these affairs.

As it usually happens, somehow thus, they are exposed and they lose the prestige and their seriousness, those who continue expressing incontrollable their personal opinions and the widespread opinions about the cosmological questions, without they have heard about the theory "Completed Universe and Relativity of Energy" and without have not understood the solution that this advanced theory offers !
 

 

REMEMBER! Soon, when they will need to describe and explain in the science the beginning and substance of things with the simpler expressions, concisely, without mathematics and magic dimensions, they will not find better-aimed and faster way to do. Oh really! Do you made the simplest thoughts (exhaustively) before, you begin to search the answers in the difficult problems?

 

 

 

When we do not name any particular thing and we search what traits are the same (common) for all the things without exception, this easy thought can be checked equally easily in the experience. If you claim that the all things have a common trait, then it will be supposed we will not find one thing which it would not have this trait. This extreme generalization, with which we attribute a trait for all the things without exception, gives the advantage to does not need we determine precisely the number of things, that they have the same trait and not need to distinguish, what are these things and what are not. It does not need the time-consuming and diffi­cult investigation in order to determine, what things and if these have the traits that we attribute in them.

For example, if we claim that the politicians are liars, with this generaliza­tion possibly we make an error, after we attribute the same trait (that they say lies) in a number of political persons, than a few individual cases of our experi­ence. Then, if they are not liars all the politicians, it is not easy we calculate their number and we distinguish who are the liars and who are not. It needs time for scientific investigation and to be overcome a lot of difficulties and al­ways with the danger of some inaccuracy in the conclusions or invalidation of conclusions, after the things are changing.

Does exist same traits for all things without exception? If they exist, then this case means that these traits will exist in each picture (or more widely in each per­ception) of the things. If the same traits exist in the all things, from this thought results, that their common traits might be observed from all humans and in the all experiences. It is truth, all things have certain same traits and in point of fact this theoretical ascertainment have become in ancient years, yet. From the History, we were informed that in ancient years, the humans had thoughts (correct or erroneous) about the all world and very easily were expressed general opin­ions about a big number of things, without previously they have search in the things. The humans had this possibility from the nature and their biology, because the words that are shaped with their voice, they expressed and transmitted some abridgements (summarizing traits) of the things. The words are not the things, do not forget it. They are made and connected from each other so as to they express the things and it could not become, if did not exist same traits and regularly elements in the things. An interjection in moment of fear transports a message of danger and this same message can be received from a lot of recipients and then, those recipients will express with a similar way (with a similar interjection). The meanings that the simple words express are constitute certain common traits, which the other humans recognize, when they hear the same words.

This possibility of be reported fast, soon, briefly, concisely and overall in big number of things, with few words and with observation in minimal number of cases, they had perceive it and attempted do exploit it theoretically, the humans which we named " philosophers ". From the historical testimonies, we have informed that first Aristotle (384-322 B.C. born in the ancient city Stageira of Macedonia) searched the reasonable and linguistic possibility of the human and recorded the observations and his conclusions. The books of Aristotle about the human thought and logic were assembled at the Byzantine period in a book with known title " organon ". Aristotle found a region of Science that we call " Logic " and his theoretical work, later in the Middle Age, it influenced decisive the philosophical and scien­tific thought of Arabs and in all Europe on a lot of centuries. The basic observa­tions of Aristotle about the formation of our thoughts and how we distinguish the truth (as are the laws of logic, identity, not contradiction and the law for excluded third) they are taught up to today in the schools and in the Universities of all world, in some cases without know him. Aristotle's philosophical work did not cease constitutes a source of inspiration for many thinkers and researchers of philoso­phy. Aristotle, since the pre Christ epoch, already he has distinguishes and men­tions a small number of words in the daily vocabulary, only ten fundamental sig­nificances, which calls CATEGORIES. These categories include the first and es­sential traits that we find in the things and under concepts, they can be classified and be categorized the other significations and the things.

A thing IS something, with certain attributes (QUALITY), IT HAS, IT IS RE­LATED (or IT IS REPORTED somewhere, it is found in the SPACE, in the TIME, someHOW it affects, somehow SUFFERS from the action of other things and it can contains a QUANTITY. The SUBSTANCE is one from the fundamen­tal significations, for which were developed a lot of philosophical theories. That is to say, we can separate a multitude of things depending on the quality, the quantity, per time that exist and the area where they are found, how also what they are con­nected, how they are influenced and what they cause and so on.

Many centuries afterwards, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), in his own philosophi­cal effort to explains the success of mathematics and the failure of metaphysics, he processed again the categories of Aristotle and claimed a big foolishness (even for that season) with one than more intelligent and laborious philosophical theories, that strengthened the philosophical current of Agnosticism. Kant claimed, that we do not know the things such as these are alone them and inde­pendent, never, but only like the things so as appear to us with the categories that our human intellect imports. He considered the human intellect as something isolated, away from the things and the things perfectly otherwise than the phenome­na. In this foolishness (I'm sorry Kant), few years later answered very masterfully, the German abstruse philosopher Hegel (1770-1831), in his philosophical work under the title "The Logic":

 

" These categories, unit, reason, result etc belong of course in the intellect. If from two facts that we perceive, the first is the reason, the other is the result, this, the causal relation does not fall in the perception, but it is arrested only from the intellect. However from this fact, it does not follow, that the categories are only own ours determinations (exclusively) and that they are not also determinations of objects. And however Kant, so consider them …

 

 

 

Next page

 

 

e-mail

© 2004-2013 Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis - All rights reserved

 

THE THEOLOGY        http://www.kosmologia.gr             SCIENCE            

OF

 HOME PAGE

 

ABOUT

clock

Best view at 1024x768px | screen 17"minimum | IE v.6.0 +