The title " Theology of Science" implies some opposition to the religion. It still expresses a reaction in the bias, that the Science is not involved with Theological and Philosophical questions. The
term "Theology" it remains because the Existence of God is not rejected. On the
contrary, as somehow the title implies, the existence of God becomes acceptable
after a rational approach and new determination of the significance about God, through
the formation of a cosmological theory. From an other view, it is implied that the Science with the Theology, they do not have perfectly otherwise or irrelevant fields of search.
Clarification: It does not become acceptable
and does not constitute a base any concrete religion or certain philosophical
theory of past. The writer and theorist of this work accepts more easily they
characterize him " atheist ", than to he gets involved in religious
juxtapositions and does not want religious or antireligious reactions. (Cf. more in the page Religion & Reliability).
In that book, which was published in the limited number of
copies in 2000 (publications Dodoni, ISBN 960-385-019-5, number of pages 442),
has become a big effort to be answered totally also condensing the big questions
of Philosophy, avoiding I am based on ready thoughts or on previous theories. A
multitude of random and fragmentary observations in
the experience and a multitude of separate explanations can result more fast, more easily and not accidentally.
They can, through the theoretical analysis of some significances, with the
correlation of few general concepts and with our possibility we know the all
things through observation of some relations and resemblances in the nearest and the most usual
things of our experience.
view I aimed to prove with the book "Theology of Science " and
tedious and little comprehensible. With multiannual, daily and unselfish search,
without the advantage that the computer offers and without the briefing from the
In that book, was published for first time an
original cosmological theory, complicated with tedious analyses of meanings and with a lot of
ambiguities. This theory about the beginning of the Universe comes contrary
to sovereign theory of the “Big Explosion” and brings aptly the special title
“Theory of Finished (Total) Time and Relativity of Energy ”.
More briefly - but with some inaccuracy I call it " Theory about a Simultaneous Universe
". It is a bold theory, that explains and describes unified the
existence of matter and relation between the time, space and with the appearance of the Life. This theory, with usual and daily
vocabulary achieves to enters in scientific questions creatively,
which they are presented in the physics from a different course.
In parallel with the cosmological theory was attempted the
answers in the two other central and direct related questions of Philosophy. The
formation of views around the meaning of knowledge and about the verification
of its reliability, they led to the concise formulation of an introductive
theory about the knowledge, generally. This theory explains the relation of
intellect with the senses and the possibility of knowledge beyond our most
direct personal experience. (I call it also, Theory of Abstraction).
I call the theory thus, because as I explain, the intellect makes abstraction of traits from the pictures
(impulsively) and creates the significance of words
not only with conscious and reasonable way. The abstraction of traits and the
summary opinion for the things they begin from the data of senses and this
THE BASIS OF THEORY
THE BIG IRRATIONALITY
MATTER & THE LIFE
& INTERNAL UNIVERSE
LIFE & MATTER
AN UNIFIED SOLUTION
WHAT IS THE TRUTH
THE SIMPLE LOGIC
EXTRACTS FROM BOOK
•EXTERNAL LAST PAGE
•SUBSTANCE & MATTER
•ANIMAL & MAN
•BIRTH & DEATH
THE LOGIC OF RELIGION
IRRELIGIOUS: YES ATHEIST: NO!
THE BIG IGNORANCE
A PROVIDENT ETHICS
SCIENCE & LIFE
ETHICS & PERSONAL FIGHT
THE BASIS OF ETHICS
TOTAL TIME AND...
NUMBERS & UNITS
A BLIND THEORY
LIFE OUT FROM EARTH
ENERGY & TIME
PHILOSOPHY & PHYSICS
that the senses are intellectual activity
with first containment outside of the intellect. The first data of our senses already
are extracted traits and
the pictures constitute short opinions for the things!
Finally, the search round the question of destination of the Life and about the
human behavior led in cogitations for the formulation of a moral
Theory about the Mental and Internal Orientation, such as
I have denominate this theory.
Our time is limited and precious. If you do
not like "brainstorming" or you have not free time, read the best-aimed and interesting
what are vague, obscure, uninterested and the finicality.
If we take into consideration, how we are
tired in order to understand and retain the thoughts from novels, about
ephemeral questions and about insignificant things, then we will not find so
much very obscure this theoretical approach. The imperfections and the
ambiguity, that characterizes the philosophical questions, should not overshadow
the main thoughts and the originality of this meditative effort. Moreover, if we
think, that the book orientates us about diachronically and "anywhere" questions
and to it explains us, the close relation among the Universe with time and with
Life, then we will not demand it is more comprehensible than a school book.
Soon, when they
will need to describe and explain in the science the beginning and substance of things with the simpler expressions,
concisely, without mathematics and magic dimensions, they will not find better-aimed and faster way to do.*
Since the ancient years
up to today, many thinkers and philosophers with their important works
reacted with the more brilliant and powerful way in the biases, in
foolishness, in frivolity and in human egocentricity. They approached big
truths, they put brake in unilateral opinions and extremities, they
highlighted the wealth of internal world and they were defended a
philosophical way of life. I feel the need to express
my admiration and optimism and together my sorrow for those who, it did not happen or
I could not study until now, still.
My excessive optimism
about the possibility of knowledge does not aim in the appointment of my own
opinions and it does not come with ignorance of the efforts that has become
of many other thinkers and in the science. On the contrary, it comes from
long formation of my thoughts, which began in young age, when my
educational level was incredibly discouraging still and I did not expect
this possibility of the human thought. With this expression again, I do not
want to say that my own intellect achieved approaches near the asked big
answers, but that this possibility existed in the human since the more ancient years. I
consider very important the fact, that the Philosophy exists historical. Even more, given that the human thought in the Philosophy
achieved enormous jumps and reached almost in the all likely solutions of theoretical problems.
I thank you and I wish
you to find satisfactory answers and if no these, then my own work to
constitutes a source for inspiration and encouragement for your own efforts!
©2000, ISBN 960-385-019-5
It does not exist prospect re-print !
only in Gr language