*

THE COMPLETE COSMOS & THE MATTER  /  THE SELF-REGULATING UNIVERSE & THE LIFE

Thoughts from a new start and about a beginning... Earth

***                                                                              comet

* HOME |     | ABOUT |     | FIND THE EXIT! |     | COSMOS & LIFE |     | COSMOLOGY

*

KNOWLEDGE &THINKING     |      MAN & SOCIETY     |     THE BOOKS     |      PHILOSOPHERS

message

DECEPTION

?

 

For creatively thinking!


 

 

He has many in order to says...

 

THE THEOLOGY OF SCIENCE. WHAT IS IT ?

 

button

eye

button

The title " Theology of Science" implies some opposition to the religion. It still expresses a reaction in the bias, that the Science is not involved with Theological and Philosophical questions. The term "Theology" it remains because the Existence of God is not rejected. On the contrary, as somehow the title implies, the existence of God becomes acceptable after a rational approach and new deter­mination of the significance about God, through the formation of a cosmological theory. From an other view, it is implied that the Science with the Theology, they do not have perfectly otherwise or irrelevant fields of search.

 

 

Clarification: It does not become acce­ptable and does not constitute a base any concrete religion or certain philosophical theory of past. The writer and theorist of this work accepts more easily they characterize him " atheist ", than to he gets involved in religious juxta­positions and does not want religious or antireligious reactions. (Cf. more in the page Religion & Reliability).

 

In that book, which was published in the limited number of copies in 2000 (publications Dodoni, ISBN 960-385-019-5, number of pages 442), has become a big effort to be answered totally also condensing the big questions of Philo­sophy, avoiding I am based on ready thoughts or on previous theories. A multitude of random and fragmentary observations in the expe­rience and a multitude of separate expla­nations can result more fast, more easily and not accidentally. They can, through the theo­retical analysis of some significances, with the correlation of few general concepts and with our possibility we know the all things through observation of some relations and resem­blances in the nearest and the most usual things of our experience. This view I aimed to prove with the book "Theology of Science " and I became tedious and little compre­hensible. With multi­annual, daily and unselfish search, without the advantage that the computer offers and without the briefing from the Internet.


 

In that book, was published for first time an original cosmological theory, complicated with tedious analyses of meanings and with a lot of ambiguities. This theory about the beginning of the Universe comes contrary to sovereign theory of the “Big Explosion” and brings aptly the special title “Theory of Finished (Total) Time and Relativity of Energy ”. More briefly - but with some inaccuracy I call it " Theory about a Simultaneous Universe ". It is a bold theory, that explains and describes unified the existence of matter and relation between the time, space and with the appearance of the Life. This theory, with usual and daily voca­bulary achieves to enters in scientific questions creatively, which they are presented in the physics from a different course.

 

 

click here!

 

 

In parallel with the cosmological theory was attempted the answers in the two other central and direct related questions of Philosophy. The formation of views around the meaning of knowledge and about the verification of its reliability, they led to the concise formulation of an introductive theory about the knowledge, generally. This theory explains the relation of intellect with the senses and the possibility of knowledge beyond our most direct personal experience. (I call it also, Theory of Ab­straction).

 

 

I call the theory thus, because as I explain, the intellect makes abstraction of traits from the pictures (impulsively) and creates the signi­ficance of words not only with conscious and reasonable way. The abstraction of traits and the summary opinion for the things they begin from the data of senses and this process shows,

 

 

COSMOLOGY


THE BASIS OF THEORY

 

A SIMULTANEOUS UNIVERSE

 

THE BIG IRRATIONALITY

 

MATTER & THE LIFE

 

LIFE & IGNORANCE


LIMITATION & IGNORANCE

 

THE EGOCENTRISM

 

BEHAVIOR & INTELLECT

 

PARTIALITY & SENSES

 

THE SENSES & INTELLECT

 

ETHICS & KNOWLEDGE


BAD SIGNS

 

INTERNAL-INTELLECTUAL TURNING

 

ETHICS & RELIGION

 

GOD & UNIVERSE


ETHICS & INTERNAL UNIVERSE

 

GOD, LIFE & MATTER

 

AN UNIFIED SOLUTION

 

GNOSEOLOGY


REAL THINGS & WORDS

 

WHAT IS THE TRUTH

 

KNOWLEDGE & EXPERIENCE

 

THE SIMPLE LOGIC

 

BIG Q - SHORT ANSWER !

 

EXTRACTS FROM BOOK


EXTERNAL LAST PAGE

GRAVITY & UNITY

SUBSTANCE & MATTER

THE MATTER

ACTIVITY & CONSTANCY

GOD & ETHICS

THE GOD

SIMILARITY & DIFFERENCE

ANIMAL & MAN

RELATED QUESTIONS

BIRTH & DEATH

THE OPPOSITIONS

 

 

RELIGION & TRUTH


THE INCONSEQUENCE

 

THE LOGIC OF RELIGION

 

IRRELIGIOUS: YES ATHEIST: NO!

 

FINAL DESTINATION


THE BIG IGNORANCE

 

A PROVIDENT ETHICS

 

ILLUSION & EGOCENTRISM

 

MONEY & POWER

 

SCIENCE & LIFE

 

INTERNAL VALUES


ETHICS & PERSONAL FIGHT

 

THE BASIS OF ETHICS

 

TIME-SPACE-MATTER


DEFINITIONS

 

A TOTAL TIME AND...

 

NUMBERS & UNITS

 

THE ADVANCED THEORY

 

A BLIND THEORY

 

REJECTION

 

LIFE OUT FROM EARTH

 

CIRCULARITY (graphics)

 

MATTER, ENERGY & TIME

 

PHILOSOPHERS


MATERIALISM & IDEALISM

 

GOD & PHILOSOPHY

 

PHILOSOPHERS

 

PHILOSOPHY & PHYSICS

 

that the senses are intellectual activity with first containment outside of the intellect. The first data of our senses already are extracted traits and the pictures constitute  short opinions for the things!

Finally, the search round the question of destination of the Life and about the human behavior led in cogitations for the formulation of a moral Theory about the Mental and Internal Orientation, such as I have denominate this theory.

 

Our time is limited and precious. If you do not like "brainstorming" or you have not free time, read the best-aimed and interesting lines. Overtake what are vague, obscure, uni­nterested and the finicality.

 

If we take into consideration, how we are tired in order to understand and retain the thoughts from novels, about ephemeral que­stions and about insignificant things, then we will not find so much very obscure this the­oretical approach. The imperfections and the ambiguity, that characterizes the philo­sophical questions, should not over­shadow the main thoughts and the originality of this meditative effort. Moreover, if we think, that the book orientates us about diachronically and "any­where" questions and to it explains us, the close relation among the Universe with time and with Life, then we will not demand it is more co­mprehensible than a school book. Soon, when they will need to describe and explain in the science the beginning and sub­stance of things with the simpler expre­ssions, concisely, without mathe­matics and magic dimensions, they will not find better-aimed and faster way to do.*

 

 

Since the ancient years up to today, many thinkers and philosophers with their important works reacted with the more brilliant and powerful way in the biases, in foolishness, in frivolity and in human egocentricity. They approached big truths, they put brake in unilateral opinions and extremities, they high­lighted the wealth of internal world and they were defended a philosophical way of life. I feel the need to express my admiration and  optimism and together my sorrow for those who, it did not happen or I could not  study until now, still.

 

 

My excessive optimism about the possibility of knowledge does not aim in the appointment of my own opinions and it does not come with ignorance of the efforts that has become of many other thinkers and in the science. On the contrary, it comes from long formation of my thoughts, which began in young age, when  my educational level was incredibly discouraging still and I did not expect this possibility of the human thought. With this expression again, I do not want to say that my own intellect achieved approaches near the asked big answers, but that this possibility existed in the human since the more ancient years. I consider very important the fact, that the Philo­sophy exists historical. Even more, given that the human thought in the Philosophy achieved enormous jumps and reached almost in the all likely solutions of theoretical pro­blems.

 

I thank you and I wish you to find satisfactory answers and if no these, then my own work to constitutes a source for inspiration and encou­ragement for your own efforts!

 

 

cover book

©2000, ISBN 960-385-019-5

It does not exist prospect re-print !

 

Download the book !

only in Gr  language

Remember!

 

 

 

THE SCIENCE WILL REACH IN ITS OWN THEOLOGY

e-mail

© 2004-2013 Konstantinos G. Nikoloudakis - All rights reserved

 

THE THEOLOGY        http://www.kosmologia.gr             SCIENCE            

OF

 HOME PAGE

 

ABOUT

clock

Best view at 1024x768px | screen 17"minimum | IE v.6.0 +